To: Oldpuppymax
Still makes no sense to cast “transvestite Tom” Hanks as an army Ranger.
2 posted on
05/17/2018 8:39:01 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Still makes no sense to cast “transvestite Tom” Hanks as an army Ranger.Hanks did just fine in the role. One of the greatest war films ever. Spielberg was robbed.
12 posted on
05/17/2018 9:07:32 AM PDT by
Drew68
To: BenLurkin
Still makes no sense to cast “transvestite Tom” Hanks as an army Ranger. Of the main characters I think that Captain Miller was the least important.My favorites were Pvt Jackson and Sgt Horvath...but I really liked Carparzo,Riben,Mellish and Doc as well.Wasn't crazy about Upham.
There are lots of films I'd like to see in 4K...Private Ryan being one of them.
29 posted on
05/17/2018 2:52:29 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(You Say "White Privilege"...I Say "Protestant Work Ethic")
To: BenLurkin
“transvestite Tom” Hanks as an army Ranger.
You're a classic FR nutbag......Hanks is no more a transvestite than you are...........Since I'm certain about Hanks, that leaves you up for question.........Sheesh!
37 posted on
05/17/2018 4:53:05 PM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(Mother nature is a serial killer......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson