Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
Still makes no sense to cast “transvestite Tom” Hanks as an army Ranger.

Hanks did just fine in the role. One of the greatest war films ever. Spielberg was robbed.

12 posted on 05/17/2018 9:07:32 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68

Agreed. It did a great service by introducing the Greatest Generation to a lot of kids who had very little knowledge of what happened then.

I remember speaking to my 10 year old nephew who saw it, and he said “Those things never happened” when talking about the beach scenes. I reminded him that not only did they happen (or things similar) far worse happened that would never find their way onto a movie screen.

When they gave the Oscar for best movie to “Shakespeare In Love” that was the last Oscar ceremony I ever watched.

The movie had it’s faults, but I don’t think the casting of Tom Hanks was one of them. And Hanks did give us “Band of Brothers” which was very well done, IMO.

There is a lot to fault Tom Hanks for, but he gets a pass on those from me. (That said, I don’t watch his new movies any more)


22 posted on 05/17/2018 11:03:51 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson