<My scholarship currently focuses on applying liberative pedagogies in engineering education, leveraging best practices from womens studies and ethnic studies to engage students in creating a democratic classroom that encourages all voices. In 2005 I received a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation to support this work, which includes developing, implementing, and assessing curricular and pedagogical innovations based on liberative pedagogies and student input at Smith, and understanding how students at Smith conceptualize their identities as engineers. I seek as an engineering educator to be part of a paradigm shift that these pedagogies demand, repositioning concerns about diversity in science and engineering from superficial measures of equity as headcounts, to addressing justice and the genuine engagement of all students as core educational challenges.I seek to revise engineering curricula to be relevant to a fuller range of student experiences and career destinations, integrating concerns related to public policy, professional ethics and social responsibility; de-centering Western civilization; and uncovering contributions of women and other underrepresented groups.
She will come to Purdue from Virginia Tech. This is an excerpt from her faculty page there:
Rileys research interests include engineering and social justice; engineering ethics; social inequality in engineering education; and the liberal education of engineers. In 2005 she received a National Science Foundation CAREER award on implementing and assessing critical and feminist pedagogies in engineering classrooms. Students in Rileys research group are pursuing interests including culturally inclusive pedagogies; understanding faculty motivations and approaches to teaching engineering ethics; connections between critical thinking and engineering ethics pedagogies; engineering education policy; and public participation in engineering projects impacting communities.
Let me simplify all this gobbledygook for you: EXPECT MORE BRIDGES TO FALL DOWN.
“encourages all voices”
Doubt that.
It was more important how the bridges felt about themselves...
Feminism poisons engineering.
Reading her resume made my head hurt.
I wonder if the women engineers were responsible for the short-cuts in the bridge construction?
that seems to be a recurrent theme in educators' bios these days. And we let them access young minds. Why is that?