At some point Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc. need to be reigned in as “public utilities” or the equivalent and held accountable to not discriminate. If they claim they control content, then hold them directly accountable for hate and violence, for the content. If they claim it is their users, then hold the users accountable. But if these sites pick and choose what they allow, then they own the content and are responsible. Discrimination against pro-American, against conservative groups, against Christian groups should be at their doorstep, their liability. They will quickly find that SPLC or any other biased organization is not in their or the public’s best interest. The DOJ might open up a civil rights case to explore the abuse of our civil rights by these companies.
There is VERY little comparison between a Christian Conservative American citizen and a Sovereign Citizens of the United States. As the later does not even exists. If you are a Sovereign Citizen it is only logical that you are NOT beholding to ANY other country OR ITS Constitution, or ITS LAWS. THAT MEANS YOU ARE A CRIMINAL IN THIS COUNTRY AND REFUSE THE AUTHORITY OF ITS LAWS!
And what 1st amendment rights do you have on a web site that is owned by a private entity? If you bitch about You Tube banning people because of their content, then I suggest you just GO AWAY, because this very web site does the same thing to idiots we dont like.
What is your point here, exactly?
My wife and I took on the SPLC after 9-11 when they introduced the Teaching Tolerance program in our local schools. This series was supposedly to prevent violent backlash against Muslim students after the event. Ironically none occurred although Boston Marathon, Ft. Hood, Orlando, San Bernardino and on and on have. We researched Teaching Tolerance and found it to be multi cultural drivel which expounded on the themes of white privileged and white racism. We protested and were told to go pound sand. We investigated and found that the SPLC instructor left alone with the students in the class room had no DOJ background check as required by California law. We checked and found out he had an arrest record for attacking a fellow female worker at a restaurant. Program was shut down, our home address given to students so they could mail us unfaltering comments, our children harassed to a minor amount. Would we do it again. Damn strait!
it’s the tatars or something like that