Posted on 03/11/2018 8:27:47 PM PDT by AJFavish
Go to http://www.marklevinshow.com/audio-rewind/ and scroll down to the audio file for 3/8/2018. At 1:05:35 to 1:07, Levin has a discussion with a caller until the caller, out of the blue, brings up Vincent Foster. Levin shuts down the conversation quickly with disdain. What little the caller had to say about Foster appears to me to be mostly inaccurate. The caller stated that Miguel Rodriguez testified around 2002 that the crime scene was plowed . . . .
First of all, I don't think we can say for certain that it was a "crime" scene because we do not know with 100% certainty what happened. Even the issue of whether suicide was a crime in Virginia on July 20, 1993, is not clear. However, there is credible evidence that it was a crime scene, but we are uncertain. There also is credible evidence that there was illegal tampering with the scene, but again, this is not 100% definitive. There is 100% definitive proof that the Robert Fiske and Kenneth Starr reports about the death are negligently, if not intentionally, deceptive.
I don't know about any "plowing" of the scene. If the caller was using the word "plowed" to mean that there was tampering with the scene, the caller may be correct.
The name Miguel Rodriguez is accurate because Rodriguez was the prosecutor in charge of the Foster investigation in Kenneth Starr's Office of Independent Counsel. However, I am unaware of Rodriguez ever testifying about the Foster case.
It is very unfortunate that somebody like Levin, who is so accurate and insightful on so many issues, in my opinion, is willing to speak about something with definitive disdain, without giving any indication that he has a factual basis for such disdain. He may have good reasons for being so dismissive regarding the topic, but I have never heard them.
Here is a portion of the Foster section of my website at http://allanfavish.com/index.php/vincent-foster discussing Rodriguez (go to my website for numerous links in the following):
After my lawsuit concluded, two documents were discovered in the National Archives by citizen researchers Hugh Turley and Patrick Knowlton in 2009. I did not learn about it until February 2016. The documents were written by Miguel Rodriguez, who was an Assistant United States Attorney who led the Foster death investigation for Kenneth Starr's Office of Independent Counsel.The documents are Rodriguez's letter of resignation and a 31-page memorandum to his fellow prosecutors in the OIC explaining why the evidence does not support a conclusion of suicide in the park. At pages 18-20 of the memorandum Rodriguez states that he has seen two photographs of Foster's neck that show a wound on the neck. The Government's official conclusion was that there was no wound on the neck. Rodriguez states that one of the photos was an autopsy photo and the other was taken when Foster was in the park. The two documents are here, at the website maintained by Turley and Knowlton. In July 2016, I received a certified copy of the Rodriguez memorandum from the National Archives with this cover letter.I tried to take Rodriguez's deposition during my lawsuit, but the Federal District Court denied my request. During the course of the lawsuit, both the Ninth Circuit and the Supreme Court ignored my request for a review of the District Court's denial. The request to the District Court was contained in a motion that was filed January 19, 2001 to insure that any photos produced by the OIC are the pristine originals. The motion asked the court to compel the testimony of former OIC prosecutor Miguel Rodriguez and his former OIC assistant Lucia Rambusch regarding allegations of illegal conduct by OIC and FBI personnel as to one or more of the photos at issue in this case. The exhibits to the draft are omitted from this online version, but the pertinent portions are quoted in the motion.
WorldNetDaily published a story about the Rodriguez documents here on February 28, 2016.
Many of the original source documents used in my lawsuit were published in two volumes by the United States Senate in 1995, which are available at many libraries, and online here and here (scroll down to volumes 1 & 2). Video of hearings broadcast by C-SPAN on July 29, 1994 is here and here, and on July 20, 1995 is here.
Levin is totally comprised. He will be lucky if he is part of the 60% who aren’t publicly exposed.
Having an on-air discussion about Vince Foster is not a productive use of time at this point in our history. It just isn’t.
If nothing has happened thus far, to those involved, it ain’t gonna happen. Let’s move on to something more current, Bill and Hill skimming money from the Haitian Rescue funds after that earthquake, or like Hillary’s gang trying to effect election results
Mark Levin is a huge self important A hole. I hate how he talks over callers and cuts them off.
If the caller was black he would let him speak on it. Anyone notice he always panders to callers of certain races, but if you are white he is rude?
I haven’t heard Levin in ages. But I’ve heard hosts that have summarily hung up on callers with disgust when they suddenly (via non-sequiter) change tack a topic that they did not call about.
Callers that suddenly change the topic of their call without warning typically have an agenda and a specific question, point, or piece of information that they want broadcast to the audience. In some cases, they might have gotten their shot with the help of the host —if they were honest about what they were going to talk about with the screener and it was put through to the host.
I will NEVER forgive Levin for his treachery against Trump and conservatives in 2015-2016. NEVER. And I say this as someone who bought all his books, listened to every show or podcast for 5 years straight, and even stood on line twice in NJ and VA to have him sign books. He and Glenn Beck are dead to me forever.
Levin doesn’t put specific topics on the show. Unless you’re black or have an accent.
Can’t blame Levin, this stuff drives intelligent listeners way.
Back in the day G. Gordon Liddy had a radio show during the Vince Foster era. As an experience FBI agent, and with contacts still within the FBI, he said he couldn’t be sure if Foster was murdered or committed suicide, but the one thing he was sure of was that, whatever happened, didn’t happen in Ft. Marcie Park. The body was moved to there.
If this case had been properly investigated when it happened, would we have the swamp we have today?
If this case was properly investigated today, how long would the swamp last?
Liddy was great on the radio back in the day.
Levin is a Hal Turner.
In other words, forget the whole damned business since we know that humma, hiliary and soebarkah are never going down.
In fact, soetoro is about to become a TV producer.
"Move oh, folks. Nothing to see here. Just keep moving on..."
I never did all you’ve done, but I was a Levin fan .. no more. He permanently alienated me, just as you, during the 2015-16 primary season. Tho I have to admit I was headed that way for a long time.
Bibi was his show tonight.
Vince was. Clearly murdered by the beast
Anyone with ANY knowledge of this matter from 93 will come to that conclusion
The gun. The rug fibers the torn up suicide note. The body placement
The heading off by park police. The emptying of his office etc etc etc
Seth Rich. Same deal
We are quite similar. It is astonishing those who went to the dark side of NeverTrump insanity. These same people to a T in one way or another gave Obama a pass or treaded delicately. The Trump derangement is pathetic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.