Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The first launch of NASA’s SLS rocket delayed again
Behind the Black ^ | February 21, 2018 | Robert Zimmerman

Posted on 02/22/2018 5:15:23 AM PST by Voption

SLS continues to be this ever receding but very expensive fantasy, scheduled for a future that never arrives, while spending enormous amounts of money that would be far better spent in other ways. The first launch, should it happen in 2020, would be three years later than originally planned, nine years after the initiation of the SLS project, and sixteen years after George Bush first proposed it. For this single unmanned test mission NASA will have spent about $25 billion.

(Excerpt) Read more at behindtheblack.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: delayed; elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; nasa; robertlightfoot; robertzimmerman; sls; spacex
Acting NASA Administrator Robert Lightfoot acknowledged that the space agency’s heavy-lift rocket, the Space Launch System, would not make its first uncrewed test flight until 2020. The first crewed SLS-Orion mission is still due to take a trip around the moon and back in 2023.
1 posted on 02/22/2018 5:15:23 AM PST by Voption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Voption

The US apparently has no Rocket Scientists anymore.


2 posted on 02/22/2018 5:19:44 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

They all work for SpaceX now.

NASA has no business at all developing a launcher. They need launch services, which are already available.


3 posted on 02/22/2018 5:26:02 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal

The SLS is kind of like the F-35.

Over promised,under delivered and way over budget.


4 posted on 02/22/2018 5:30:27 AM PST by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Voption

NASA = post office, DMV, Blockbuster Video, Kmart


5 posted on 02/22/2018 6:49:59 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; BTerclinger; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
The SLS is just a non-shuttle replacement for the Shuttle which uses an iteration of the Shuttle liquid-fueled engines, but since that won't get it off the ground (no joke), the strap-on boosters are extended burn versions of the solid rocket boosters used in the Shuttle. IOW, they're getting paid to give us essentially the same thing we used to have, minus the wings.

Obviously, the system is obsolete before it ever flies. NASA's and the DoD launch systems should be migrated onto the order-of-magntitude cheaper systems in use by SpaceX and in development at SpaceX and Blue Origin. Period. Thanks Voption.

6 posted on 02/22/2018 11:12:42 AM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Yeah NASA makes sure all their employees whether needed or not get to punch the clock and get paid. They need to decide if they want to remain relevant in manned space travel at some point. If they do they have to fire a lot of people, punish financially some contractors who are not delivering as promised and on budget and commit to manned space flight. Right now they are as irrelevant in manned space flight as the North Korean manned space program.


7 posted on 02/22/2018 12:26:31 PM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson