Posted on 02/13/2018 1:28:12 PM PST by COUNTrecount
While the official portraits of Barack and Michelle Obama unveiled Monday were applauded by the art world—for their intense visual impact as much as the choice of Kehinde Wiley and Amy Sherald, artists who are both critical darlings and the first African-Americans to paint presidential portraits commissioned by the National Portrait Gallery—there was plenty for the Twitterati to snark about. The wall of greenery behind President Obama was an obvious opening for jokes about his history with marijuana and Sean Spicer hiding in the White House bushes. Criticism of Michelle Obama’s portrait centered around two points. The face didn’t look much like her; some suggested it more closely resembles Kerry Washington, who plays a high-powered White House operative on Scandal. And the face—whoever it belonged to—was overshadowed by the striking, floor-length dress.
But there’s a reason for both of those criticisms: The dress is what says the most in this portrait, far more than the indistinct face.
First, the criticism about the lack of resemblance to the former first lady comes as no surprise to those of us familiar with the work of Sherald, a Baltimore-based artist. While she is best known for her stylized portraits of African-American women, they aren’t really portraits they depict anonymous subjects, under evocative titles contrasting grayscale skin tones against colorful clothing and a monochrome background. The neutral palette challenges racial stereotypes, while the flat plane evokes American folk art, At the unveiling, Sherald described the composition as “the act of Michelle Obama being her authentic self”—suggesting that she was aiming for something more than a mere superficial resemblance.
Secondly, there’s a reason why Obama’s face is the least interesting element here: The dress is as much a window into the former first lady’s identity as her face, and possibly a more accurate one.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Re: The gallery or presidential pics. Too funny, but sadly true.
Well barf
call it what it is...bad art.
I think it is GREAT art that depicts these criminal scum accurately and well. I hope it is displayed far and wide to remind all of what malignancies these frauds are.
Oh, never mind ...
Politics aside ... those are crummy amateurish paintings. Of course the Obamas selected the painters so it is their fault.
One of these things is not like the others
One of these things just doesn’t belong
Can you tell which thing is not like the others
By the time I finish my song?
Not that I am a Sesame Street fan, but.........
That was the artist who painted Barry in the Bushes.
another: why does TheMoose look like Valerie Jarett?
Artist did a good job of hiding Michael’s Adam’s apple.
5 fingers and no thumb (hidden?) on their holy “anointed one”.
There’s probably more but I got better things to do right now...the dryer needs the lint cleaned out.
She’s got her white girl wig on.
Those are awful portraits.
Cultural appropriation
How about this suit on Obama when he kicked the door in a temper tantrum.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.