Posted on 02/13/2018 5:00:58 AM PST by EyesOfTX
And while there make it clear that "I can't recall" does *not* qualify as the truth.
Is this real? Or are we being played? (you, know, one of those things with the (”Sarc”) behind it?
I’ve been following all this very closely, but this what happens when I take my eye away from the news for a couple days and actually do other things.
Anyone care to summarize what the hell is going on here....?
Did Rice flip? That was always a theory....
Wondering same thing.
Just learning myself. This may have something to do with it.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/12/declassified-susan-rice-email-obama-contemplated-hiding-russia-intel-from-incoming-trump-administration/
That’s Hil-Liar-eous.
None of this is news. Trump loves wife beaters is news. Chris Wallace said so. By the way, I learned something about Chris Wallace yesterday I was totally unaware of but suddenly he fits.
Rice wrote an e mail to herself stating that she dindu nuffin and neither did Obama. Just in case any investigator was wondering.
Humor.
Oh, c’mon, people, it’s obvious parody.
None of this is news. Trump loves wife beaters is news. Chris Wallace said so. By the way, I learned something about Chris Wallace yesterday I was totally unaware of but suddenly he fits.
If Chris Wallace is anything like his dear old dad, there is tons and tons of sexual harassment in his background.
Is this real? Or are we being played? (you, know, one of those things with the (”Sarc”) behind it?
___________________________________
When it comes to Susan Rice, I can believe it. Zero’s munchkins, being liberal egotists, truly believe they are smarter than anyone else on the planet. Just look at John Brennan!! What makes this neat is I bet Rice went and did this on her own volition and now Zero is seething over her stupid self-serving memorialized attempt at exoneration.
This was meant to be read. This is pure troll bait!
It’s dripping with sarcastic provocation. It’s basically saying, we got away with it all, and I can even joke about it, because by not making serious statements, you can’t call this a confession, but I still need to poke and jab you with the truth.
“I’m out. We lost but I’m going to convince myself we still won because you can’t touch us. Here is something to put in your pipe. Smoke it.”
Exactly , 0 must be seething .
No. Grassley sent Susan Rice a list of questions about an e-mail that she sent to herself at 12:15 pm on Inauguration Day (January 20, 2017). Rice’s e-mail to herself is rather curious, as she recounts (to herself) what was supposedly said by Obama in an Oval Office meeting with Comey, Biden, and Sally Yates, that took place over two weeks earlier, on January 5, 2017.
It appears to be an attempt, after the fact, to provide cover for obama, to suggest that he told Comey to make sure that whatever he was doing with respect to the Trump-Russia collusion fantasy, was “by the book.” Since it is now quite clear that little, if anything, about that sham “investigation” was “by the book,” Grassley’s Judiciary Committee has a few questions they’d like Rice to answer.
For my part, I think Obama might actually have said “by the book,” but the book he was referring to was “Rules for Radicals.” ;-)
btt
CYA memo on last day kind of funny they weren’t smart enough to get this out earlier
Grassley - Graham letter:
https://www.scribd.com/document/371379264/2018-02-08-CEG-LG-to-Rice-Russia-Investigation-Email#from_embed
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.