Who “should” be indicted?
Everyone responsible for allowing the Kenyanesian Usurpation to happen.
Who will be indicted?
Probably nobody, because almost everyone in DC was complicit.
They are more likely to wake up one morning as pampered professors.
hot hair flying around these days
Is that sexist? Furrist? Or a reference to the Friday Night Follicles?
Seems Barky has gone to ground lately. Must big killing him to have to keep that fat mouth of his shut.
Sedition would be if some domestic terrorist group or Sanctuary City Government, of Antifa, etc. were to conspire to overthrow, etc.
Sedition is a high crime but still less than TREASON.
It is TREASON that applies, why?
Actually, Treason and Sedition both apply but Treason is the appropriate charge for some of the criminal ring, why?
Because Sedition applies to ‘persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States’.
Whereas, Treason applies to those ‘owing allegiance to the United States’.
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim
The DOJ and FBI persons caught in this attempted soft Coup d’Etat, a de facto act of war, took an OATH (https://www2.fbi.gov/publications/leb/2009/september2009/oath.htm) and that OATH puts them squarely into the category of persons owing allegiance to the United States.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3630124/posts?page=246#246
I google “Barack Obama latest appearance” and get next to nothing. As far as I can determine, his last public appearance was in December 2017, when he was interviewed by Prince Harry.
What’s about Hillary calling for people to join the resistance.
Since there were at least Brittons and Russians involved, that goes to treason.
Imho of course..
5.56mm
The penalty for sedition can also be death.
I mention "sedition" in every reply to the ongoing Barack/Hillary/Soros/MSM mess, the attack on our Presidency.
Sedition always was (is?) a hanging crime...
Today, it should be more so than ever!
But if the Deep State is as powerful and as frightening as people claim, a coup by them would be quick, successful, and not recognized by many as a coup.
This was a fishing expedition. Some people knew there wasn't anything to be found. Others thought there was. But they were all hoping something would turn up.
Nowadays, somebody is always declaring that a presidential election was fraudulent or invalid and the result needs to be overturned. That's common practice.
What makes this different was the connection between the Clinton campaign at one end and the FBI on the other. Actual law enforcement authorities usually aren't involved in such operations (so far as we know).