[Enterprise]

Y'all keep your hands off of those staffers. Ya hear?

[Pollster1]

That will be as ineffective as Chicago banning guns. Why bother with rules that will be universally ignored?

[RightGeek]

The DNC needs the same policy

[Pearls Before Swine]

Body cams all around.

[The Antiyuppie]

Wonder how many “will not seek another term”. Party’s over.

[philman_36]

Ah, legislating morality. Let’s see how this plays out.

[blueyon]

they had to make a bill for this, they just did not know they should not do it.................scary that these people make the laws for our country

[gathersnomoss]

Yet another meaningless bill/law in a third world country. This BS has got to stop.

[Vermont Lt]

That happened in my company in, let’s see....1975.

What world do these people live in?

[ladyjane]

LOL - why else would anybody run for Congress? Okay, maybe the money too.

So are they going to go around with UV lights, checking out the congress critters’ offices?

[petitfour]

How homophobic!

[Dogbert41]

Many years too late for all those abused Page Boys.

[SERKIT]

George Costanza: “Was that wrong?”

[Honorary Serb]

What about marriage?

[ptsal]

Does this resolution continue to allow legislators to screw their constituents?

[Fightin Whitey]

Nobody hit on Babbs lately.

[Chauncey Gardiner]

The Chandra Levy rule?

[Flick Lives]

How about banning sexual relationships between lawmakers and their constituents, because they been f’ng the public for decades.

[CodeToad]

They don’t enforce criminal laws anyway so bother making more rules??

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

And the penalty would be....fire the staffer.

[Captain Peter Blood]

How will they enforce that. You cannot enforce a SEX ban, hormones will find a way.