Joe diGenova on The Larry O'Connor Show (WMAL) Jan 24, 6:54 PM

WMAL Larry O'Conner Show ^ | January 24, 2018 | Larry O'Conner - Interviewer

[iontheball]

Interview covers Joe's views on Mueller/Trump sit-down, the FISA warrant process and the DOJ fraud on the court, Admiral Ryan's heroic action, Joe's disgust of the upper echelons of FBI and DOJ, Hillery hack Blumenthal's involvement in FISA warrant, Judge Contreras, the missing text messages, etc.

[iontheball]

I never get tired of listening to Joe validate my assessments. I note he is making a number of appearances on WMAL lately and his good words in support of Sessions makes me speculate he may be in discussions with Sessions. We can only hope.

[sneakers]

bump to listen later

[Bobalu]

Thanks for posting this...well done.

[Just mythoughts]

Admiral “Ryan”? I do agree with the rest of what you typed.

[jimfree]

Joe is the best. Enjoyed him several years back as speaker for a Federalist Society luncheon. Never miss his Monday morning visits on WMAL-DC. He always opens the 7:00 hour after the news break.

[butterdezillion]

This is a little bit off-topic, but maybe law enforcement people will come to this thread who can explain this.

These unsealed indictments at the state levels - I see there are a bunch of them in Nebraska, for instance - is there a reason they would be in Nebraska? Were the crimes necessarily committed in Nebraska, or can they just farm out the federal indictments to whatever state they want? What do these unsealed indictments in all these various states mean?

I’ve been saying for some time that the FBI is a sick joke, based on my interactions with them. I even had a Lincoln Police Dept detective tell me the FBI office in Lincoln had blatantly lied to me. And a number of other people here who have dealt with FBI people have also said they’re a sick joke. I’m wondering if these indictments being in Nebraska, for instance, means that the crimes filtering all the way down through the system to the state-level offices are being dealt with.

Hearing QAnon talking about only 40% of the corruption being exposed because the public can’t handle any more than that makes me wonder just how finely the wheels of justice will grind in all this.

Thanks for any insights offered.

[gaijin]

Later

[iontheball]

Admiral “Ryan”? I do agree with the rest of what you typed.
___________________________________
Too may ‘Rs’, too many admirals, too many actors to keep straight. Also, Corsi has indicated that the President has lost all confidence in the deep state civil service intelligence agencies and he has now put all his trust in the military intelligence side. Whether this is the result of Mike Roger’s advice I do not know, but it does back up Joe’s insightful statement that when the country was hanging on a thread, it came down to the military (Adm. Rogers) saving the country from the political traitors. You can be sure, if there is anyone Trump trusts it is Mike Rogers.

[taildragger]

Ryan =’s Rogers IMHO, that’s ok, we all have The Hunt for Red October on the brain somedays... ;-)

[Lurking Libertarian]

Were the crimes necessarily committed in Nebraska, or can they just farm out the federal indictments to whatever state they want?

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed."--U.S. Constitution, Sixth Amendment.