Good graphic. I am curious about the source of the data.
Posted on 12/30/2017 10:27:02 PM PST by Para-Ord.45
Can't find simple charts revealing obamas 8 years of sub 3% GDP. Can find articles but no detailed govt. source such as Dept. of Com.
All help is appreciated.
https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2017/february/unemployment-rate-dynamics-us-europe
I think there might have been a very few quarters of 3+% growth, but not many.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3616076/posts
you might find more tools for your toolbox here:
Every economic number for eight years was revised downward (negatively) after the initial announcement. Every formula based number was given a new formula to sway the numbers artificially for the news cycles and to avoid inflation related increases to Soc Sec, DoD retirements, etc.
GDP 2008-2016....dork...
Dept of commerce was surveying my company. I was cooperative. Monthly call. K, big deal. Then they went political. That poor SOB that I got to the point of crying at the end of his last call where I told him where to put his head physically because metaphorically it was about to burst out of his mouth. DOC had just put out false DJT info. Last time I got the for info call from them. Less overhead.
Nope it was the first “recovery” with no quarters if three percent growth
Are you saying that the data being put out on our growth during this past year is incorrect? If so is it too high or to low?
Good graphic. I am curious about the source of the data.
St. Louis Fed data
Que the picture of toilet flushing.
The problem is one number would be reported under Obama and then revised downward.
Catching a snapshot of the revised figures might be difficult.
http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/27/news/economy/gdp-report/index.html
GDP report: Economic growth revised lower
by Annalyn Censky @CNNMoney
September 27, 2012: 9:49 AM ET
The U.S. economy grew even slower than initially reported in the second quarter, as both consumers and businesses spent less than originally thought, and the drought in the Midwest limited agricultural production.
Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the nation’s economic health, grew at an annual rate of 1.3% from April to June, the Commerce Department said Thursday, slower than the 1.7% rate the government last reported in August...
http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/29/news/economy/gdp-report/index.html?iid=EL
Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the nation’s economic health, grew at an annual rate of 1.7% from April to June, the Commerce Department said Wednesday, slightly higher than the 1.5% rate originally reported, and in line with economists’ expectations.
cooking the books as the 2012 re-election loomed.
Trump will be making gdp charts look like a real hockey stick for economic history.
Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.