Posted on 12/19/2017 2:18:23 PM PST by Nextrush
Late Monday, Acting US Attorney Steven Myhre filed a motion saying the defense should not be allowed to say federal agents actions caused the defendants to be entrapped or to act in self-defense.
This is a repeat of the stance he took in the first two trials where evidence of entrapment and aggressive federal actions that caused the defendants to act the way they did was not disclosed to defense lawyers.
The jurors are scheduled to come back to the courthouse tomorrow and we should find out then what the path of the trial will be, if any
Is this move going to succeed again in light of what we know now? Is it for "propaganda purposes" for a future jury pool if there is a mistrial?......
(Excerpt) Read more at nextrushfree.blogspot.com ...
Resistance is not supposed to be futile and the BLM doesn’t want you to know this.
Why?
What stopped you from posting the whole thing right here?
Why can’t president Trump end these prosecutions already, and stop the feds from doing raids like this again?! Long overdue to Drsin the Swamp!
Actually both Trump and Rip van Sessions have strong Statist tendencies/proclivities/sympathy, especially when dealing with Real Estate.
Well why doesn’t the BLM and prosecutor just go ahead and put out a list of arguments the defense is allowed to make.
Tyrants. Damned tyrants.
The prosecutor makes his case, the defense makes any argument he deems relevant. The Jury decides. At least it was that way in old America.
He was praised by the Southern gentleman Sessions? Did they wake him up one afternoon.
The president’s business experience includes development of real estate. He did not like government regulation getting in the way of it.
I can agree with him in principle on that.
This case should cause us to think a little bit about Uniparty politics bought and paid for business interests.
Is the “protection of land” for real or is it a subterfuge to fake out environmentalists with the end game being little people losing their land like the Bundy’s as part of a transition process that will leave land in the hands of big business interests or being used by big corporations who buy politicians?
Didn’t president trump unwind, rescind obsmmy’s last minute landgrabbing of private property , though? I believe it was several million acres?
Trump has expressed support of eminent domain of private property for private (corporate) purposes.
little people losing their land like the Bundy’s
**********
Curious how much land does/did Bundy own in fee that he lost?
The actual Bundy Ranch is 160 acres.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.