To: davikkm
As much as I support Trump, and recognize that the government spy agencies are out to get him, allowing the President to create his own private spy agency is a bad precedent to set.
2 posted on
12/07/2017 9:10:54 AM PST by
caligatrux
(Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
To: caligatrux
Not new. Pinkerton men worked for Abe Lincoln and General McClellan.
5 posted on
12/07/2017 9:18:01 AM PST by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
To: caligatrux
Phoenix the CIA and FBI and likely some of the other 15 agencies of the IC. They are still in coup mode.
6 posted on
12/07/2017 9:18:33 AM PST by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: caligatrux
He can rely on private consultants and contractors as much as he chooses
In this case it serves all of us
15 posted on
12/07/2017 9:34:35 AM PST by
silverleaf
(A man who kneels for the national anthem doesn't stand for much of anything)
To: caligatrux
As much as I support Trump, and recognize that the government spy agencies are out to get him, allowing the President to create his own private spy agency is a bad precedent to set.
><
I agree. Tyrants like Hillary would love it.
16 posted on
12/07/2017 9:36:44 AM PST by
laplata
(Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: caligatrux
Sounds like a highly flawed assertion.
Given the level of corruption in our current treasonous, weaponized agencies and the limited options in fixing them.
17 posted on
12/07/2017 9:40:33 AM PST by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: caligatrux
Reagan did his own end run around the CIA which was feeding him a lot of Top Secret BS.
30 posted on
12/07/2017 12:30:02 PM PST by
arthurus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson