Seriously: aren't those synonyms?
Isn't the real question -- is the FBI incompetent, or is it actively supporting criminals?
Focus on the meeting in Phoenix.Get Lynch,BillyBob,ILLary,Brazille and others under oath.
Since terms have precise legal meanings, and precisely refer to particular terms for a reason, FBI need review the phrasing and remove the legally undefined “extremely careless”, replacing it with an appropriate precise legal term - like “grossly negligent”.
One law for thee, another for her
For an example of how a legally defined term carries precise meaning:
In New York State, a “rifle” is _not_ a “firearm”. Both terms are carefully defined, and not the way normal people use them. Unlicensed possession of one is legal, the other will get you thrown in a cage.
And in this case, “extremely careless” has no legal meaning, thus is not relevant or meaningful to an FBI formal decision. Send the conclusion back for re-writing to say something which actually, legally, means something.
In the words of "Reverend" Wright, it looks like "the chickens are coming home to roost". The Dems have opened a can of worms that can be closed.
Gross negligence is a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or both. It is conduct that is extreme when compared with ordinary Negligence, which is a mere failure to exercise reasonable care.
I must assume that “extremely careless” is a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care.
In California the courts prepare juries by defining Gross Negligence for the jury as “Extremely careless”
Regards,
That’s the exact point that pissed me off to no end. Intent is not an element and extremely careless and grossly negligent are the same.