Skip to comments.
Total sealed indictments in Mueller's Grand Jury: 31!
@lizcronkin ^
| nov. 8 2017
| Liz Crokin
Posted on 11/08/2017 5:21:48 PM PST by bitt
BREAKING: 7 new indictments filed in DC, that's 31 total! President Trump wasn't kidding when he said today would be a big!
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: grandjury; indictments; lizcrokin; mueller; muellerinvestigation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: bitt
Is Liz Crokin our Freeper LIZ. Haven’t seen Liz in about a week?
21
posted on
11/08/2017 5:49:22 PM PST
by
DrDude
To: Cicero
Im also curious about the skipped numbers
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
??? oooops Saudi *accident* ????????????
To: Right Wing Assault
I believe there were 11 (eleven) new ones filed today. The numbers are in sequence and these drops fill in the blanks and I think the total is now believed to be 31 in these groupings. That said, there's no way for certain to know what these are but it's certainly possible they are. It's in DC so it's apparently not uncommon to have lots of them ... but these are coming in bunches and they appear to be tied together which is apparently uncommon.
HOWEVER ... according to the Toobin meter, meaning Jeffery Toobin, he would certainly be in a position to know and he looked pretty gloomy on CNN discussing whether Trump might pardon Flynn's son with no mention of what predicament might well await the Podestas.
To: bitt
Is there any ham left in Washington?
24
posted on
11/08/2017 5:50:19 PM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
To: DrDude
25
posted on
11/08/2017 5:51:04 PM PST
by
bitt
(press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally)
To: bitt
Are there enough Clinton/Obama Judges left to handle the cases ?
To: bitt
To: bitt
7 new indictments filed in DC Pathetic, that this "reporter" doesn't realize these would be for the entire COURT, not just Mueller's grand jury. Potentially worse, are those that breathlessly insist it's all true, without a single care for whether it's accurate or not, because it's so "fun" to rile everyone up.
28
posted on
11/08/2017 5:55:31 PM PST
by
Golden Eagle
("A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me" - Trump on Nov 3, 2017)
To: DrDude
I’ve seen links to the raw reports on Reddit over the past days since Saudi Arabia drained their swamp and Mueller went to the office on Saturday when it appeared they began dropping and have continued in bunches since ... that said, they’re sealed, only CNN knows, and they still aren’t saying anything, which probably means a lot.
To: bitt
If we can believe it. They are sitting on them.
30
posted on
11/08/2017 5:58:28 PM PST
by
Lopeover
(The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
To: DrDude
Somebody compiled the list using a computer based on the docket
They dont have to be indictments but good bet there are a lot of indictments and some related to mueller
Some may be charges with a plea deal...like flynn
31
posted on
11/08/2017 5:59:13 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
To: bitt
This is from the same source that reported a Hillary/Huma/14 year old girl sex tape.
Not exactly Edward R. Murrow.
32
posted on
11/08/2017 6:04:46 PM PST
by
Vermont Lt
(Burn. It. Down.)
To: Golden Eagle
33
posted on
11/08/2017 6:06:24 PM PST
by
Vermont Lt
(Burn. It. Down.)
To: bitt
The real question are any of these related to Russia election collusion?
34
posted on
11/08/2017 6:07:45 PM PST
by
ForYourChildren
(Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
To: bitt
Total sealed indictments in Mueller's Grand Jury: 31! So after following the actual link, it appears that you are the one that created this title, claiming there are 31 indictments DIRECTLY related to the GRAND JURY. Not the attention hog reporter, who at least only claimed they were for DC, somewhat admitting that is for the overall DC court, even though her post was still extremely misleading in order to gin up the most interest.
So did you insert the words "Grand Jury" into the title here on FR? And why?
35
posted on
11/08/2017 6:10:02 PM PST
by
Golden Eagle
("A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me" - Trump on Nov 3, 2017)
To: gubamyster
Thanks for the link to
https://twitter.com/Imperator_Rex3/status/928430755700600832 as follows:
1. A few observations on sealed indictments & the direction of #TheStorm .
2. First, for the doubters out there, some FACTS about sealed indictments.
3. Mueller's grand jury is in Washington (DC). That is the grand jury that recommended indictments against Manafort, Gates & Papadopoulos.
4. The relevant court to file indictments (sealed & unsealed) is the US District Court (District of Columbia). Again, the indictments against Manafort, Gates & Papadopoulos were filed there.
5. As at 3.30pm TODAY, there are 33 sealed indictments filed. All 33 have been filed since 30 October, an 8 day period.
6. 17 of these were filed TODAY (to 3.30pm). Experienced lawyers are on record saying that 4-7 a month is not unusual for this court, anything above that is high. What we are seeing is totally unprecedented.
7. ALSO : remember, an indictment can have MULTIPLE accused (eg Manafort & Gates). One indictment does NOT mean one accused.
8. I cannot find any evidence of a massive crime, or criminal takedown in this jurisdiction since 30 October. At least not one that's been done in public.
9. Or in the weeks/months prior. So - the lack of any other major crime, location of Mueller's grand jury, previous indictments from it & the sheer number being filed over a short period of time makes it reasonable to conclude that most, if not all, are related to Mueller's SC.
10. Let's use that as a working assumption. The next question is whether the storm winds are blowing in the direction of Trump & Co, Clinton & Co, or at both.
11. Liberals are certain that this all portends a Trump takedown. Mind you, they also believe the Steele Dossier is 100% true, that Trump is a rapist & that he & Putin somehow manipulated voting machines last November.
12. The whole 'evidence' requirement seems to be missing. For example, libs still can't explain just how Trump & Putin manipulated the popular vote for St Hillary & the electoral college for Trump - on the same day. Their TDS is Defcon 10 & blinds them to inconvenient facts.
13. In their world, Trump & his entourage are ALL Putin stooges & in their excitement at the evil Drumpf's imminent downfall, they've developed juvenile 'indictment bingo charts', see
14. One thing about deranged liberals - they never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. In this case, the chart. Count those on the chart waiting to be indicted. 21, right? In their stupidity, they have included Trump, who as POTUS cannot be indicted. So that leaves 20.
15. But wait a sec. We've 33 indictments (growing), but only 20 possible traitors? You're right : doesn't add up. Not even close. OK: let's say only 17 of those indictments are SC. And that 7 of them have 2 accused. That's 24 possible accused. Nope, libs, still doesn't add up.
16. So, 30 + sealed indictments. Libs have no credible evidence supporting the Trump-Russia lie & in their wildest imaginations, have 20 Trump people max in the crosshairs. Yet we DO have credible evidence of Clinton-Russia, which could easily round up well over 30 people.
17. There are many people going down here on multiple indictments. This is genuinely huge and entirely consistent with what we have seen in KSA, Wray's appointment, the Fusion GPS revelations, Podesta's resignation & disappearance, Uranium One etc etc. Conclusion?
18. The STORM is NOT blowing Trump's way, whichever way you cut it. And that makes sense, because the entire Trump-Russia smear was a lie. There's never been any credible evidence supporting it. As Trump has been saying, ad nauseam, ever since the smear emerged.
19. So, in what way is #TheStorm tracking? Look at a map of the world. It started in KSA a few days ago & has been blowing LEFT ever since. Anyone who has been corrupt MUST be charged, but IMO most will have a (D) behind their name & will answer to St Hillary of Clinton.
20. Again, just my 10 cents. While confident I'm at least 70% +++ right, I am more than happy to be proved 100% +++ wrong.
The end.
https://twitter.com/Imperator_Rex3/status/928430755700600832
To: DrDude
Skipping of numbers is NOT uncommon on federal criminal filings. Happens all of the time in my district and I practice in federal criminal court probably 80% of the time. Nothing weird about it at all. Many times there will be transfers in on supervised release from another district and they will be assigned case numbers in order, but won’t appear on PACER until sometime down the road when everything is finalized.
37
posted on
11/08/2017 6:10:44 PM PST
by
gopno1
To: Golden Eagle
She doesnt even understand that they arent necessarily indictments
For those that keep posting that they are indictments. .compare docs on manafort and papadapolous. .both were sealed
38
posted on
11/08/2017 6:11:12 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
To: gopno1
So can you please confirm that they may not all be indictments
39
posted on
11/08/2017 6:13:04 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
To: Steven W.
I cant get past him claiming they are all indictments.
40
posted on
11/08/2017 6:14:15 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson