Posted on 09/21/2017 8:09:04 PM PDT by Edward.Fish
Fascinating, but no one who can do anything about it will investigate.
Another piece to the puzzle. I’m thankful, but who will investigate further? Sessions? Ha-ha. The Capitol Hill police? Ha-ha. The FBI? Double ha-ha.
|
It’s equally likely that these matters are already under investigation.
Logic.
I don’t see what the meaning of all this is.
Who?
The FBI?
Hey that first one is almost exactly the amount of the ads that Putin bought on Facebook so that his buddy Trump would be elected.
Of course there are a lot others.
I dont think the murder of Seth Rich will ever be solved. I dont think the powers that be, are interested in solving his murder. They dont want to commit Arkancide, and they dont really want to see how far up the DNC chain of command it it goes.
The link doesn’t work
Please enlighten me. What is Crowdstrike, how are they involved with the two deaths, and who made the payments to Crowdstrike?
I am not sure that the deaths are a solid link BUT the fact that the DNC paid the firm who convinced the FBI and 16 other US intel agencies (yeah, right!) that Russia hacked the DNC servers IS PRETTY SIGNIFICANT...
I misread that as “Dropping breaches...” Obviously, time for bed.
Want to buy a bridge? It gets used daily.
(That subject was being discussed on a different thread here tonight.) :-)
(On the other hand, the claim in the ad, "Stopping breeches with unmatched prevention" sounds rather ominous, if you think of it in relation to a murdered man, and a possible professional hit-man with Soros connections.)
Crowdstrike was the computer protection company used by the DNC.
The DNC was allowed to reject the FBI “offer” to search the DNC computers after their claim of hacking was reported. The DNC chose to stick with Crowdstrike.
The question is the FBI failed to investigate but took Crowdstrike’s word for the “hack”. Next thing is it gets blamed on Russia. FBI takes their word on that, as well. In all cases the FBI did not independently investigate the Clinton campaign computer nor the DNC computer nor develop the sources of the dossier against Trump.
All these sources were associated with and paid by and developed by Democrat operatives associated with Hillary or in getting her elected. This is the summation of the Russia story. The FBI itself had nothing of corroboration that any of it was true, against Russia.
So it was the DNC that paid Crowdstrike on those dates? The article didn’t say who paid them.
To find the real killer one must follow the money to the originating decision maker to have the two people killed. Was it the same person both times? Was it DWS?
I presume DNC paid them. They were the ones who contracted with them. Certainly it should have been a DNC budgeted item for electronic security.
This is not to say it wasn’t Soros money. He can contribute to the DNC like anyone else. Crowdstrike is associated with some Soros groups, according to the article link above.
Looks like $100K each.
Sounds about right for a contract killing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.