Watch: Dana Loesch of the NRA Calls Out the New York Times

IWB ^ | Mark Angelides

[davikkm]

Popular Conservative pundit and NRA spokeswoman, Dana Loesch, has released a new video calling out the New York Times for their bias, dishonesty and subservient compliance with the Democrat party. She berates them for being complicit with their “Democrat Overlords” and lets them know that the NRA now firmly has them in their sites.

The NRA has in recent history been very politically active; casting their support for candidates is often a good indicator of the candidate’s likely success or failure, but to actually target a News Agency is quite a big leap. And this isn’t a one-off. Just last month, Loesch took the Washington Post to task in a video because of their anti-2nd Amendment stance. It seems the NRA is willing to start getting their hands dirty in the political arena.

[MarMema]

The NRA is distinctly responsible for tons of voters showing up to vote for Trump who had not voted in ten or more years.

Thanks for the reminder to send them a donation.

[DakotaGator]

...but to actually target a News Agency is quite a big leap.

Well it would be. But neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post is a news agency. They are propaganda agencies for those bent on destroying the Constitution and America with lies masquerading as "news".

All entities supporting liberty, justice, and freedom should be attacking these fake news organizations. They are the enemy within.

[sargon]

...the NRA now firmly has them in their sites.

"sights".

[mazda77]

“Democrat Overlords” and lets them know that the NRA now firmly has them in their sites.

SIGHTS! Blogging on a cell phone usually does not work out well.

[Balding_Eagle]

Anyone have a direct link?

I can’t get through the ad wall they built.

[Vaquero]

Did she say fist? Heh heh.

[Former Proud Canadian]

“...neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post is a news agency. They are propaganda agencies...”

Exactly.

[real saxophonist]

Direct link

[moovova]

Darn spelchek.

[Robert357]

Words and actions are two different things.

When the NRA talks about the actions it is taking to challenge the NYT and lists them, then that is News. When the NRA or it political action arm files a friend of the court position against the NYT in the S Palin liable case, when the NRA or its political action arm files in a court proceeding where the NYT violated political campaign (in-kind gift donations) public disclosure laws, when the NRA objects to a sale of the NYT or major media company, then those are actions.

[gunnyg]

Whatever their stated purpose, they’re all indoctrination machines.
;)
GyG!
***

[stormhill]

That's risky language considering that after the shooting of Gabby Giffords, Sarah Palin was blamed because she allegedly used cross-hairs to indicate districts that could be made to switch party control.

Should there be a shooting at Times HQ or reporters targeted, now they'll be able to say "Dana did it!" or in some way make NRA responsible.

[ex91B10]

Punctuation doesn’t seem to be a strong point of the author either.

[budj]

“... in their sites.”

“Sights” if you are talking about targeting.

[Balding_Eagle]

Thanks for the link.