Sure, a risky murder on the street to shut him up?
Not buying it. There are easier, less risky ways to take care of such a situation.
That fact that he wasn’t robbed is meaningless. No one knows why he was murdered or by whom.
So, some make up a motive. It’s like extrapolating an odd light in the sky into aliens visiting from another planet.
It fits previous hits like the witness right outside the courtroom. The shooters are never caught. When you own the investigating agencies there is not a hell of a lot of risk.
For arguments sake, let's say TPTB in the DNC wanted him dead. How does one conduct a political murder in Washington DC? You can't have him kidnapped and "disappeared" because the search for him may uncover more than the murder itself. Fake drug overdose? Not in his character. Hit and run driver? Maybe. Not old enough for a heart attack with prostitutes.
IMHO staged robbery is still the most simple option
Why did Assange/Wikileaks offer $20,000 for info leading to Seth Rich’s killer?
It’s a “risky murder”?
Then why hasn’t anyone been caught?
Why would a murder “to shut him up” be discounted? Would robbery have been less risky?
There are not unlimited motives for murder. Just because can be one. I guess.
Is it just me or does no one else remember walking home at 4:30 A.M.? Has anyone called his girlfriend at 4:30 just to say “Hi”? Anyone? Hi honey. Just called(at 4:30 A.M.) to say there’s nothing wrong and I’ll be home in a little while! Gotta go!
Really?