Posted on 07/08/2017 5:51:29 AM PDT by NOBO2012
Trump meets Putin at the G-20. They discuss Russian interference in the election and agree on a Syrian ceasefire. CNN reports on the comments from the respective Secretaries of State on the topic of “hacking” which, rather unsurprisingly, disagree on what Trump and Putin said to each other.
But apparently agreeing to disagree isn’t good enough for Chuck E. Schumer who immediately criticized Trump by saying he has an “obligation to take the word of our intelligence community rather than that of the Russian president.” Apparently he, however, has no obligation to take our Secretary of State’s word rather than that of Russia’s Foreign Minister on what transpired in the meeting.
This was the big take-away from the Trump-Putin meeting for both Chucky and CNN. Apparently they both believe Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and think a Syrian ceasefire is fake news.
Posted from: MOTUS A.D.
The man has the personality of a gnat. Cuomo would have him on his knees.
In todays world, optics are everything.
Schumer looks like the smarmy @$$hole he is.
The type you just want to b*tch slap...repeatedly.
The tell will be a new selfie book published around 2019 or so.
This is the party that ran Hillary Clinton, though, gotta remember that. Schumer probably seems fresh and exciting to them after trotting Hillary around all last year.
The slob cannot even tie his tie correctly.
PDJT has an obligation to take the word of all 57 LSM organizations.
Interestingly, no MSM outlet remembers OBAMA’S feud with FNC.
7 years ago
Obama: Fox News is ‘destructive’ to America
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/28/obama-fox-news-is-destructive-to-america/
They touted her "vast experience".
It was her turn.
She was to be the FIRST woman president.
Nothing helped her.
If it wasn't for a rigged system in the Demonrat party, Bernie would have beat her.
Schumer is like Hillary...without all the attributes.
CNN?
I think most people rely on actual news services, preferably foreign without an ax, no faux intellectual/faux celebrity “news” readers, and no sniveling little DNC operatives.
If I catch CNN at all, I just turn to Rosie O’Donnell if I want an indepth laughathon.
Yes. The “Top Cat” is the one who doesn’t care about the blusters of the lesser cat. Trump will do the “You’re the dominant one” magnanimity and turn the other guy’s hand up. It’s like saying, “You are an important man, I will give you the dominance” which means “Naturally I am dominant, it goes without saying, so I will GIVE you dominance in this display.” It’s polite and it says you already know there is no contest.
There is no intelligence establishment consensus about so-called Russian meddling - only 3 to 4 agencies presented such a view, not 17 as the fake news media has argued.
Former DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson admitted last month, no vote was changed or hacked in last November’s elections. No proof has been presented Trump’s election owed anything to outside interference.
We cannot build good relations with Russia if we keep flinging groundless accusations against them. Our government should reveal the evidence or shut the heck up. We need strong cybersecurity. We can do that ourselves and in cooperation with Russia and other countries for we too aren’t vulnerable to hacking. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities know no borders.
Russophobia poisons the waters and gets us nowhere to resolving the issues that divide us. Democrats and their captive media have great difficulty accepting President Trump was elected fair and square. Blaming that on Russia also roils our domestic political climate.
Let’s focus less on the past and begin to deal with the future, for the sake of our country and the world.
Schumer is a verified liar. Nothing he says can be trusted.
Right - the DNC.
So why are they blaming Trump for the Democratic Party’s lack of cybersecurity measures. Which they didn’t put in place.
This is a partisan issue that has absolutely nothing to do with the election outcome last November.
Maybe Russia did do it but if they did, they helped Americans see Hillary Clinton for who she really was. We should be owing them thanks rather than blame them for hurting her.
That’s what its really all about.
Thanks for the memory trail link.
Maybe Russia did do it but if they did, they helped Americans see Hillary Clinton for who she really was. We should be owing them thanks rather than blame them for hurting her.
That’s what its really all about.
On TV and in the movies the CIA and other American intelligence organizations are usually portrayed as lying, bumbling, criminal yahoos. Now all of a sudden they are trustworthy.
Schumer thinks he is all-powerful but he only runs the Senate and is even a bit constrained there in that he has to let the Republicans put on a show that they are in charge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.