Yes. I would very much like an exact, scientific definition of ‘Race’.
The “Public” definition seems to have devolved into Skin Color, “Religion”, Primary Language, Political Philosophy , and others.
It’s become a Fool’s Errand.
There isn't one that you would approve of except maybe "Human."
>Yes. I would very much like an exact, scientific definition of ‘Race’.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subspecies
The only reason human races are not classified as Subspecies is the politically correct need to see all human groups as the same.
Before the age of the political correctness there was 3-7 recognized races depending on how exacting you wanted to be. Modern DNA analysis has confirmed these that these earlier race or subspecies classifications are correct.
See A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History by Nicholas Wade for references.