>>>Well, maybe the memo specifically and overtly, but the contents of the memo are essential, right? If the contents (as opposed to the blatant existence) are exposed, isn’t it a distinction without a difference?
Only if Comey directed his associates to speak to the Times about the conversation with the President. At this time there is no indication that he did.
False.
The evidence is Comey's own admission that he leaked his memos for his own personal gain. So we know he is/was quite capable of it, had the material, had the motive, and had the opportunity. As the old joke goes: we already know what he is. Now all we're doing is haggling about when he became one.
As for what kind of person you are, let's let FReepers have a look at your posting history to decide that for themselves: http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:oincobx/index?tab=comments