Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump formally asks SCOTUS to overturn lower-court rulings against travel ban
Hermancain.com ^ | 6/2/2017 | Dan Calabrese

Posted on 06/02/2017 1:33:21 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Complete article...
1 posted on 06/02/2017 1:33:21 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz

Stuff is about to get real.

Libs will go bonkers if this gets overturned in Trump’s favor.

It will be glorious . . .


2 posted on 06/02/2017 1:34:57 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz

Something else for the self-appointed SJWs to go ape excrement over.


3 posted on 06/02/2017 1:36:47 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz
9-0 should be a no brainer. This is test to determine which judges are real and which are ideological plants.
4 posted on 06/02/2017 1:38:20 PM PDT by Awgie (Truth is always stranger than fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

“Stuff is about to get real.”

When I see my husband head to the door with his rifle in his hand then stuff will get real. Until then it’s just drama.


5 posted on 06/02/2017 1:40:05 PM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

That is what it should be based on the Constitution.

But I’m not holding my breath. After all there’s Ginsberg, wise latina, Kegan and that other weasel....


6 posted on 06/02/2017 1:44:07 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz

I’ll lay my marker down.

He wins, 6-3.


7 posted on 06/02/2017 1:44:55 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Why not? They’re already Bat Guano Crazy.. ;-)


8 posted on 06/02/2017 1:45:37 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

It won’t be totally glorious until we can depose all of the petty dictators in the federal courts. Trump had better get on that FAST.


9 posted on 06/02/2017 1:47:51 PM PDT by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz

Thank you for posting from Herman Cain’s timely and pertinent website.

It’s a good addition to our reading here.


10 posted on 06/02/2017 1:51:13 PM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz

How would the SCOTUIS lift the stay? Can they do it without formally hearing the case?


11 posted on 06/02/2017 1:52:39 PM PDT by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz

This should be a no-brainer.

The Constitution grants Congress the exclusive right to regulate immigration and Congress passed a law that gives the President exclusive authority to suspend immigration if he believes it to be in the national interest.

The lower courts have ruled that Trump’s statements before he was President make his EO discriminatory. Horse Hockey. They’re desperately looking for a way to block Trump.

SCOTUS will decide, probably 5-4, that statements made prior to inauguration have no bearing on the constitutionality of an EO issued in office.


12 posted on 06/02/2017 1:55:34 PM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

I agree 6-3 to 7-2!


13 posted on 06/02/2017 1:57:09 PM PDT by DarthVader ("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

We’ve been here before.

Additional confirmation of what we already know I suspect.

Sotomayor is not ideological, she just plain retarded.

Elena Kagen is a fast food loving groupthinker.

Justice Kennedy needs his house taken from him for a minority eminent domain play to give his land to a White Castle franchise.

Weekend at Bader Ginsburgs.


14 posted on 06/02/2017 1:57:39 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz
But the first step was in asking them

Horsefeces. The President doesn't need permission from judges to enforce the laws that he is responsible for.

Still wish Trump would have told these lower judges to go to Hell.

15 posted on 06/02/2017 2:00:58 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Man-made global liberalism is killing the planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Basing the legality an EO on campaign rhetoric rather then its text is unbelievable. Should be 9-0 but it will show what political hacks are on the court so it will be 5-4 maybe even 6-3 in favor of Trump but it’s not a lock. The left has something big on Roberts l am convinced of it, the Obongo care ruling was out of nowhere.


16 posted on 06/02/2017 2:02:48 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
SCOTUS can do anything it wants. It can order the stay lifted, or to keep it in place, and they can do so with or without explanation.

It can do so in an order list, or in a Miscellaneous Order. It can delay too, if it wants.

Yes, it can decide without oral argument. The Solicitor General has filed three requests. Two for reversal of stay orders (4th circuit and 9th circuit), and one to decide the 4th Circuit proceeding on the merits, that one is a petition for certiorari.

17 posted on 06/02/2017 2:05:16 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

It will be 5-4 or 4-5.


18 posted on 06/02/2017 2:11:03 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

I thought it should be posted from the original site before something else happened to it.. ;-)


19 posted on 06/02/2017 2:18:18 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thank you for that reply. I’m not a lawyer so all I know is that to Trump a lower court decision it has to go to the Supremes... ;-)


20 posted on 06/02/2017 2:20:49 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson