After 13 years, we FINALLY get a response out of Sean_Anthony! Oh, this is a Red Letter day!
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 06/01/2017 9:19:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
childishness |
Posted on 05/31/2017 11:44:31 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
After 13 years, we FINALLY get a response out of Sean_Anthony! Oh, this is a Red Letter day!
And it would be really NICE if the unnecessary excerpting would be over with as CFP is not on the “Excerpt or link only” page.
That is truly annoying.
“for several years without all this sudden angst.......”
Excerpted, annoyingly so, for years while not on the “Excerpt or link only” list.
Hence the slow built anger.
And in post 8 the OP claimed they excerpted due to “rules” which is false.
Well, ain't that a coinkydink!
Three days of tussling with his alter ego, and all of a sudden, here he is. It's magic, I tell ya.
There's no way Dynoman had anything to do with this. He told me himself.
I know!
After 13 years, you finally deign to grace this forum with a comment, but it's only to complain that someone saved the readers the trouble of clicking through to your website.
How utterly revealing.
Who the heck really cares Darksheare, it's a conservative Canadian website.........
Since when have FR members started complaining about repeated posts from friendly sites such as that? Nobody complains about a certain member posting from Townhall.com on a regular basis.
OK Darksheare, here's an easy solution to this growing crisis: Ban the posting of any articles from Canada Free Press as well as Townhall.com........This should eliminate the angst over the growing crisis of postings from conservative websites.
Does that work for you?
So lying doesn’t bother you?
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1111944/posts
Show me Canada Free Press in the excerpt or link only list if you can.
Please, feel free.
It's NOT about the content of Canada Free Press. Its about Sean_Anthony using excerpts of articles at that site to lure readers there.
Every time a Freeper clicks through to read the full article, the cash register rings for someone. I think that someone is Sean_Anthony. His posting behavior over the last few years here supports that suspicion.
I am not worried about Sean_Anthony and CFP. He and they have been posting here for a mighty long time.
I rarely add new links to our home page. Used to on request, but got burned too many times.
Btw, CFP looks ok to me as a source. I see nothing wrong with them posting their content here.
Still down that rabbit hole?? LOL!!
Read post 52. Obviously Jim knows I and Sean are not the same person. Learn something about making speculative assumptions.
Read post 53.
So JimRob has no issue with the content of the articles posted from Canada Free Press. Big whoop. Neither does anyone else.
If he’s too busy, or not sufficiently interested to investigate the clickbot who posts them, that’s his business. Nothing I, or anyone else can do there.
In the meantime, I remain convinced that Sean_Anthony is a money grubbing abuser of this website, and that you are his alter ego, or his accomplice.
I doubt anyone would have a beef with Sean_Anthony if he were a living, breathing, active participant, like you are.
It's the behavior that makes the difference, and which raises people's hackles. Sean_Anthony has been posting about a dozen articles a day from Canada Free Press for years, with nary a comment or reply. That's mighty curious for any Freeper, especially considering that:
1. That site is heavily monetized.
2. It's the only site he posts content from.
3. It is literally ALL he does on Free Republic.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that he's using FR as a fishing hole, and using excerpts from CFP as bait. Its why he posts so many links per day to that site, and why he never responds or comments. In my opinion, it's only about the clicks to him, which put money in his pocket.
Jim said that he has no issue with the content of CFP being posted here. Neither does anyone else, including me.
He didn't say that Sean_Anthony is "fine". He said that he's been posting here for a long time. He did NOT say that he has no issues with Sean_Anthony's posting behavior.
That remains to be seen.
No, I never expected otherwise from you, even in opposition to Jim Rob's expressed statement.
By all means, Hillary, continue the fight!
Thank you very much for this approach. If Sean_Anthony doesn't make a full posting of the article, and it's not one of the sites that restrict such full posting, then, by all means, post it in full yourself and eliminate the linkage worries.
Again, thank you ...
Still obsessively trying to hide behind a misleading and 100% unrelated post from Jim?? LOL!!
Still blowing smoke screens in a pathetic attempt to hide your true intentions?? LOL!!
There's only one expression to describe you:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.