Posted on 05/30/2017 10:26:25 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
What I heard on Saturday night.
I spoke at an event last Saturday for Michael McNeely, who is a candidate to be chairman of the Georgia Republican Party. The election by party delegates will be held on June 3 in Augusta.
This election has national significance in that the Georgia Republican Party chairman (or chairwoman) is one of the three Georgia representatives on the Board of the Republican National Committee.
CFP isn’t the issue.
Spam Anthony and it’s behavior & motivation is the issue.
Stick that down your rabbit hole.
Again you act as if you know better what I think than I do. You don’t. Do you really think Jim wants to bothered by petty crap like this?? I don’t. Besides that do you really think Jim doesn’t know about articles being posted from Canada Free Press and all the other ad ridden “clickbait” sites?? I’m sure he does. They are posted by the hundreds every day here at FR. That should unwind you a bit!
If it’s an issue with Jim and the management here why hasn’t Sean been zotted after 13 years of your bitching whining and complaining?
Probably because it’s not the issue self appointed blog pimp police puff it up to be.
I don't recall having mentioned Jim.
Probably because it’s not the issue self appointed blog pimp police puff it up to be.
Life's not fair, is it?
Read the thread.
I do know better.
“Not an excerpt”
Point out for me what is so hard to understand about that?
“Not interested in driving our traffic to your blog”.
Again, what is so hard about that?
Point it out.
The exact words that are incomprehensible.
Please.
No you don’t know better what I think than I do.
If you have a problem with Sean relative to the guideline quotes you posted take it up with Jim, I didn’t write the guidelines, and have no authority in implementing them.
I don’t think Canada Free Press is a blog per the definition used in the guidelines when they were written. Certainly not a blog any more than the other sites I’ve listed. If Canada Free Press is banned they would all have to be banned.
A blog is where an author writes their own commentary. Sean doesn’t do that. The guidelines refer to using blog sites like wordpress, Canada Free Press doesn’t. The fact Sean hasn’t been zotted in spite of all the complaining supports my reasoning and interpretation of the guidelines more than yours.
In the end neither of our opinions matter very much, it’s up to the Management here to run FR how they see fit. They have allowed Sean to post excerpts from Canada Free Press articles. That is fine with me. If they decide to ban excerpts from Canada Free press, it’s fine with me. What’s not fine is all the off content bitching whining and moaning from self appointed puffed up blog pimp police. I’d guess Jim is as sick of it as anyone. Especially when the majority of posters comment on content on the Canada Free Press excerpt threads, the majority aren’t complaining.
Apparently I do.
I read the following and have no problem understanding it all:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2636843/posts?page=552#552
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2711802/posts?page=139#139
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2722423/posts
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2776537/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2548666/posts?page=38#38
please, point out the words that are so incomprehensible you need to spend post after post impotently whining about it?
Bingo.
Sean_Anthony just posted a bunch of articles again.
I just posted the excerpts in full on every single one of them, so people don’t have to click on the links.
Guess the owner of the “Sean_Anthony” bot won’t collect his $$$ for the clickbait.
So sad...
Why not take it up with Spam Anthony? Is he mute or something?
A blog is where an author writes their own commentary. Sean doesn’t do that.
Tell us more about how you know what Anthony does and doesn't do.
Did y'all discuss it over cocktails at midnight?
What’s not fine is all the off content bitching whining and moaning from self appointed puffed up blog pimp police.
Opinions bother you?
You've been expressing a few yourself. Nobody is whining about those. Hmm.
I’d guess Jim is as sick of it as anyone.
If you argue that Jim hasn't zotted Spam Anthony because
he thinks it's fine.. then the same argument can be made for
those who oppose the blatant blogpimping. Jim hasn't shut it down, it must be fine.
Right?
I’ve done that in the past, and it’s no easy task dodging the malicious adware to copy/paste the article. That site is a menace.
Right.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1111944/posts
Please show me in the “Excerpt or link only” list where Canada Free Press is.
Don’t matter. Jim doesn’t care.
I am not worried about Sean_Anthony and CFP. He and they have been posting here for a mighty long time.
I rarely add new links to our home page. Used to on request, but got burned too many times.
Btw, CFP looks ok to me as a source. I see nothing wrong with them posting their content here.
So that is the talking point now?
Free Republics rules on what can an can not be posted in full
8 posted on 05/31/2017 12:46:56 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Sean_Anthony
Free Republics rules on what can an can not be posted in full
Sorry, but FR imposes limitations only when it has a specific request from a source to either allow no posting (such as Getty), link-only posting (such as Bloomberg), or excerpt posting (such as the Washington Post). It’s up to the website Canada Free Press to tell FR that entire article posts are not allowed, and I don’t recall such a request, and I’ve been a mod for nearly ten years. Don’t blame us for your posting excerpts.
15 posted on 05/31/2017 1:35:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
Again, show me where Canada Free Press is on the excerpt or link only list.
Considering Sean flat out LIED.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.