“Yes, Robert Laurie is the author. However, in true blogpimp fashion CFP publishes it on their blog in a manner implying said author was one of their ‘staff’.”
Absolutely a lie.
http://canadafreepress.com/About-us/
“He instead creates an FR post that directs to his blogsite and a copied version of the real page instead of the true source. “
Another lie, Robert Laurie is listed as the author on the FR post. Look.
“As a side thought, I note that you and this Sean Anthony dude signed up a week apart in 2004. You wouldn’t happen to be alter-egos would you? Seeing as how you’re on the defensive here and all.. “
Incredibly stupid. The twisting is being done by you. In love with your strawman just like Winflier, both feet firmly planted in mid air.
“Objectivity is the essence of intelligence unless you intentionally overlook things that discredit your scenario. Then it’s feigned objectivity and non intelligent..”
You are the one doing that. Just like those irrationally pushing the fake Trump Russia scenario, the joke is on you. I am not Sean_Anthony. I don’t know Sean_Anthony. But don’t let that get in the way of your hallucination of who I am. It’s fun to watch! LOL!
1) The Robert Laurie authored article from hermancain.com was posted on CFP in a manner that implies that CFP was the original source. You did note how far down the page you had to go before you found out that it was sourced from Herman Cain's site didn't you?
2) The Sean Anthony dude posted the article as an FR post with a link to the CFP rather than to the originating page. Now if Judi McLeod or any of the CFP staff write an article then linking to CFP is legit. Linking, as this Anthony dude invariably does, to an article on CFP sourced from another website is at least dishonest and does create that impression that he (this Anthony dude) is worthy of the appellation of blogpimp. You seem offended by that fact. Or intentionally ignoring it.
3) The dishonesty is not in the attribution of authorship (which you managed to extract from my wording though I never stated or implied such) it is in the misattribution of source (which I did mention) for the apparent gain of bloghits. And we know that dishonesty is a quagmire.
4) I note that you quickly appropriate the manner and language of the left by characterizing points that run contrary to your narrative as lies (and then misinterpreting what was stated thus avoiding refutation of those points) and incredibly stupid. I do not recall returning that favor in kind. If that is the manner in which you wish to be addressed I am capable of doing so. I was just brought up better and chose not to stoop to the non-standards of the left.
5) Whether or not you and this Anthony dude are alter egos, acquaintances, distant relatives, or complete strangers the fact remains that you are here running interference for him while having suspiciously close sign up dates which at least reeks of strange coincidence and begs the question be raised - which it was. And you're being extremely defensive about it. Which is interesting in itself.
6) Any and all pretense you maintained of objectivity was completely invalidated by your last paragraph where you trotted into the field of Trump - Russia, a subject that was never a part of this entire thread and a comparison that has been made by no other. Such leaps of logical incongruity are more fitting of a denizen of the DUmp..