Posted on 05/22/2017 5:11:10 AM PDT by bryan999
Saturday, an anonymous person who works in Washington DC, alleged on 4Chan’s /pol/ subgroup that high-ranking current and former Democratic Party officials are terrified of the Seth Rich murder investigation.
This comes after internet entrepreneur and hacker, Kim DotCom, admitted on Saturday that he was part of an operation along with Seth Rich to get stolen DNC emails to Wikileaks.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Yes, well Comey is gone now.
And his denizens will be soon. And we have a new AG and Assistant AG.
Now a real investigation is on one can hear the beads of sweat it the floor.
I’m not so cynical as to think that “even if we had concrete proof nothing would be done”.
The Left were defeated by the people because the Left no longer soley controls the flow of information in our country (thanks to our President who has shown how Social Media can be used to circumvent the bad guys).
IF we can find just one low-level flunky willing to save his/her own skin, the dominoes might start to fall.
Podesta is panicking and lashing out in anger.
That should tell you something.
The Seth Rich trail is suddenly hot again.
If Podesta cannot focus the lens back on Trump and the false "Russian Collusion" bait, the spotlight may turn back on him, and this in particular:
The Email: In an email from John Podesta on February 09, 2016, (4 days before Justice Scalia’s death), Podesta states “Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.”
I suspect the entire Demoratic Party is shaken....and remember ol Hillary said if she goes down she would take the all with her....they may very well go down first and bring her with them when all is said and done!
Rush said he just found out recently(he doesn't tweet himself).
This is YUGE!
[ Breaking: ‘Complete Panic’ at Highest Levels of DNC Over Kim DotCom’s Seth Rich Announcement ]
Good. Let the criminal enterprise, the RICO DNC, with their murders, their lies and their propaganda worry. After subjecting us to 8 years of the fraud, the Manchurian Candidate Barack Hussein Obama, I have no sympathy for them.
oops for you guys, too
Check out # 24 , and article; comments.
Good afternoon.
“Blah, blah, blah.”
True, but at what point can the “Deep State” maintain the lies, and the Media cover for them?
Imho, their house of cards is beginning to crumble.
5.56mm
nice
Over 1,000 FBI agents were assigned to the “China Gate” investigation; all collected reams of physical and electronic evidence, but no 302s were filed (total violation of Bureau policy and regulations); every week, a team from DOJ came to the NY Field Office to collect the evidence, none of which was ever seen again; even the electronic evidence disappeared from ACS and other federal LE databases.
I remember Chinagate. Yet another scandal that I thought was going to do the Clintons in - again. It seemed to just go off the radar after the initial news.
So we've had a complete coup in our government that holds American patriots hostage. We have taxation without interested representation, real interest for We the People. The FBI exists to cover for the elites and leak to the New York Times. The CIA and others in the IC exist to spy on Americans, take care of 'problem people' and leak to the Washington Post. The NSA helps the elites identify problem people.
How is any of this different from the STASI in East Germany and the KGB in the old USSR? Is it just me or has all of this seems to have expanded exponentially over the last eight years?
The Republicans act apoplectic and scared. For the first time since Reagan, they have a real leader to lead them and have control of the House and Senate. What do they have on them? Or have we all been fools and they are just one big bloated Federal government uniparty.
The Federal government as envisioned by our Founders no longer exists. It only exists to take care of itself and their own. The American people? Forget about it. Justice? Only for the little people. Separation of Powers? Only for show. The Supreme Court? Judicial activism to destroy the constitution and conservatism. Bloated bureaucracy? The bigger we get, the more money we get, yours. The IRS? Excessive taxation plus targeting conservative groups and individuals. The EPA? Exists solely to make laws and regulations to destroy capitalism. The immigration flood? Cloward-Piven on steroids, and it's working. 220 Trillion in unfunded liabilities? Guaranteed to keep our progeny in slavery. The MSM? The propaganda arm of the DNC and DC elites.
Is there a peaceful resolution? The only recourse is an Article V Convention of States with passage of many amendments to reign in the federal Leviathan. The states need to hurry up and get this Convention going. It feels like we don't have much time.
I thought I could relax some after Trump was elected. The severity of the deep state, the psychosis of the defeated dems, the insanity of the MSM and the ridiculousness of the never-Trumpers has been an overt exhibit of the dire straits we are in.
Pray for America and prepare. Eternal Vigilance. . .
good point
“The Republicans act apoplectic and scared. For the first time since Reagan, they have a real leader to lead them and have control of the House and Senate. What do they have on them?”
By way of full disclosure, I’ve been in or very close to the Intelligence Community for a long time. I can’t find exception with a single thing you posted, but two things sprang to mind when I read the above excerpt.
I had a very good friend - a retired Army officer - who ran for, and won, a seat in the House. He only served two terms, but I visited him several times while he was in the House and we had a number of very frank, personal discussions. He informed me that, in order to get funding for his campaign, he had to agree to vote a certain way on a few select issues; others were subject to his personal principles and convictions. When he ran for reelection two years later, the list had changed. Likewise, I’ve had a few friends who were approached to run for Congress and every single one relayed a similar story; “In order to get campaign funding, I would’ve had to agree to vote a certain way on select issues, some of which I wasn’t willing to do.” While it may seem relatively harmless, contributors were, in fact, buying - or attempting to buy - votes prior to the election and buying the members themselves in the process; hardly a recipe for honest, responsible government.
The second thing that came to mind relates to my previous post in this thread. For over two years, I worked a very high-level case with the Bureau and several other agencies that related to drug trafficking, money laundering, gambling and corruption within the Mexican and US governments. On one of my first visits to the FBI office in San Diego, I was given the opportunity to view 11 federal corruption files that related to a very powerful and very wealthy Mexican family, the Hanks. Although we were not permitted to use any of the information from those files, nor discuss the details; I was told that the office wanted me to have an appreciation for how important this case (over 120, actually, among all affected agencies) really was. After I reviewed those files, I told the SAC, ASAC and Group Supervisor, “[Expletive deleted]...those files are full of names I see every day in the news. These guys own as many politicians in the US as they do in Mexico!” In other words, they were not garden-variety members of Congress and not a single one has ever been charged or prosecuted.
To illustrate, here are a couple of excerpts from an article in “el Andar” (links below), a Mexican publication that’s not exactly popular among Mexican politicians and criminals:
“A Texas bank controlled by Mexican businessman Carlos Hank Rhon donated funds to the Republican National Committee, in violation of federal election laws.”
“Documents from a Federal Election Commission (FEC) case file recently made public show that the commission found reason to believe that Gary Jacobs, the bank’s president and CEO, “knowingly and willfully” violated US laws when he donated $15,000 to a Republican fundraiser on April 3, 1995, then ordered Laredo National Bank (LNB) to issue a reimbursement check the day after.”
“The finding also raises the question as to whether the Hank family may have attempted to influence US politicians and elections. Since the Hanks became owners of LNB, Jacobs and his wife have donated over $40,000 to Democratic committees and candidates, and over $60,000 to Texas Governor George W. Bush.”
“In March, Attorney General Janet Reno wrote a letter to former Republican Senator Warren Rudman, attorney for Carlos Hank Rhon, stating that the report was a draft only.”
Link: http://www.elandar.com/hank/
There is a lot of information in the public domain about the relationships between foreign criminals and US politicians and I invite anyone reading this to do his own research, starting with the Hank family and the administration of former Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari, who was very close to the late Carlos Hank Gonzalez and his sons Carlos and Jorge Hank Rhon. A third son, Moctezuma, was killed in a boating accident in the Gulf of California. You’ll find many more mentions of relationships between the Hanks and the Bush family, but here’s a good place to start:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/mexico/family/bergman.html
The guy is brilliant in his field and tho he made a fortune off his original website, he lost it all due to the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Considering his background in hacking in the cyber world, he certainly would have ties to Wikileaks and others of that particular persuasion.
There is no reason whatsoever for this guy sitting in New Zealand to involve himself in the murder of a DNC staffer unless he did have contact with Seth Rich and was aware of Rich's connection to Wikileaks.........
What I suspect is going to happen now, if his claims gain traction, there's going to be an all out attempt by the Dems and the MSM of character assassination in an effort to discredit the guy and make him out to be a crackpot out for revenge against the US.....
So the successful conservative person who is at a stage in his life that he's thinking about running for Congress to 'make a difference' and get more conservative voices in Congress runs into the snags you mentioned.
How many good people think of running, thinking of doing the Mr. Smith thing, get manipulated right of the bat with the 'bought and paid for' meme you mention? If bet there are a lot. You mentioned "buying - or attempting to buy - votes prior to the election and buying the members themselves in the process; hardly a recipe for honest, responsible government." Sad.
Hell, I've even had the fantasy of thinking if I could skip all the pre-election brouhaha and just run, low budget, a few ads, shine in the debate, convey conservative principles and vote 100% straight conservative . . sounds good in my head but I know it's not an option, especially with what you outlined. There's no way I would agree with the donors about how to vote beforehand. . Bought and paid for. . The more I learn about the beltway dynamics, the more I realize we are in a national crisis.
Thank you for your feedback. It's good to get some insider knowledge about the way things really are. I know there are excellent people in the FBI. A high school classmate of mine, somewhat of a golden boy, played football at Notre Dame, was in the FBI for twelve years. I attempted to ask him at the reunion why he got out and he didn't want to talk about it. He's a real straight arrow so I still wonder what happened.
Also, thanks for the links. Will research.
You’re quite welcome and it is sad, but just one person’s honest perspective. It does give you pause when you consider just how much of their personal principles members of Congress sacrifice to remain in office as long as so many of them have done.
The last guy I knew who ran a low-budget, knock-on-doors campaign was Wayne Gilchrist, a former Marine and Vietnam vet, from Maryland’s 1st Congressional District (the Eastern Shore). I was living in Annapolis at the time and got to meet him and talk to him for a while. Not as conservative as I’d have liked, but a good man who had a set of principles he lived by.
Cheers!
Did Kim DotCom drop his Tuesday bombshell as promised?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
