James Comey reportedly willing to testify before Congress — but only under one condition

The Blaze ^ | 05/13/2017 | Justin Haskins

[ForYourChildren]

Less than a week after former FBI Director James Comey was fired by President Donald Trump, Comey is reportedly ready to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee, but he has one important condition that must be met if he is to testify: The hearing needs to be held in public.

The New York Times reported on Friday “a close associate” of Comey told reporters for the Times Comey is willing to testify, but he wants the hearing to be conducted in public. Comey rejected an invitation offered by the Senate Intelligence Committee on Friday to testify in a closed-door session.

{..snip..}

[shalom aleichem]

The li’l ba$$turd thinks he’s the second coming of John Wesley Dean IV - the inside guy who brought down the President

[MNDude]

I believe that if he’s questioned in private, they may follow up with questions later on. Not so with public.

[Edward.Fish]

We gotta think big here. Zero’s war against us for 8 years has dampened our hopes and expectations.
What if Comey has decided to give up Obama himself?

Honestly?
We don't need him — The Iran Deal is treason as defined by the Constitution, and all the people involved in passing it (HR 1191, as amended at least) are guilty thereof.

[txhurl]

My point is that DJT prefers the straightest, quickest line from A to B and doesn’t plan to drag draining the swamp out for years like many expect. He even alluded to this in his commencement address at Liberty today.

Notice how the RAT party is leaderless, adrift? Because none of them know when or where they’ll suddenly be on the block. Only Sanders isn’t dirty, he’s free to speak his mind.

[Grampa Dave]

ComeyComedy thinks he is still in charge.!

[Grampa Dave]

Because Hillary! won’t have him killed in public? *SMIRK*. Comedy should stay out of parks and airplanes

[Roccus]

Apparently I did, and what was accomplished?

NOTHING.

How can you possibly believe that Graham’s questioning of Yates and Clapper “took out” Comey as you stated in your 56?

Absurd!!

[Grampa Dave]

The old unknown “Close Associate” fake news from the NY Slimes.

[Roccus]

MNdude...sorry, my 87 was for txhurl, not you.

[txhurl]

I think you may have meant me instead of MNdude.

Did you or did you not watch the hearing? Done with you if you didn’t see the set-up happening live.

[Roccus]

You have far more faith in our Senators and Congressmen than I’ve been given reason to have.

[Roccus]

Yes I watched it live, and I’m done with you too.

[pas]

He wants to play lois lerner. Make a statement then claim the 5th

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

He won't and should not reveal classified material.

So we will not really get to the critical information,...so tell him nyet.

[txhurl]

Sorry about the friendly fire, there, Sir.

[\/\/ayne]

[libstripper]

He knows the classified material will destroy him; hence he wants a public hearing where it can’t be used and he can selectively refuse to answer questions because he’d be going into classified matters. The “classified material” refusal to answer questions will let him dodge them without taking the Fifth.

[free_life]

I think they should have a public session with Comey......then supeanea him to get classified answers.