Posted on 05/07/2017 10:23:33 PM PDT by Helicondelta
(Excerpt) Read more at medium.com ...
Hope it’s true. McMaster has a hole in his head when it comes to Islam
I wouldn’t mind if this were true.
Didn’t trust him from the start.
He should promote KT McFarland to the post.
Anyone keeping track of how often Mike Cernovich is right vs wrong? I don’t follow him but my general sense is he’s wrong much more often than he’s right.
Haven’t kept track but kind of like Jones and Stone they spout off a lot....
>Haven’t kept track but kind of like Jones and Stone they spout off a lot....
Jones and Stone are in my don’t believe them if they say the sun is rising in the east category.
Is NSA going to be filled by rotating 3 month stints for this administration.
As far as I know, Mike has never gotten one of these wrong.
Cernovich has been right 100% give or take 2%.
It is like he has Trump’s cell # or something.
Jones and Stone...... Usually certain. Seldom right.
Big M... Never certain, usually right.
Why the hell does this POS get a Star? We tax payers will have to pay for his increase in pension for decades to come.
Well worth it to get rid of him.
Does the military have a single piece of military brass left who is pro-America, and not a raving Lefty sycophant of Obama’s?
These guys are all philosophers, so far, and they like the mental midget candy of any pedestrian on the street over Trump. They have nothing in common with the man.
Boot their nether region to the curb and don’t look back. McFarland can hold the place down in their steed, walking backwards and in heels.
Mike is one of their buds....they all seem to just go nuts and want everyone to join them. Cernovich seems to be accusing everybody of being a pedophile, Jones keeps saying they are trying to assassinate Trump, and Stone keeps saying he has big news to dump. As far as I can tell all three are delusional
“Anyone keeping track of how often Mike Cernovich is right vs wrong?”
He is often right. I suspect that his source is either Bannon or Gorka.
Figure it out. Officers who were commissioned in 1991 are just now reaching the 25 year mark. Those who were hard charges in the '91 Gul War were by no means new to their jobs. The people in charge then had fifteen or more years under their belts and most retired out by 2001. Anything Clinton and his appointees could do to advance the careers of the treacherous crowd they favored, they did along with undermining anyone who didn't fit their idea of "their military" (Remember, "those are our planes now !!" on Clinton's inauguration day). Bush '42 went into Iraq in '03 and it wasn't the short, sweet, cake walk the Neocon crowd said it would be (the "con" in Neo con is for "con game" more often than not") which means a his administration didn't have any slack to work with if they wanted to manipulate the process in the reverse way that Clinton had. Then, eight years of Obama with predictable results throughout the Defense Department and the Pentagon.
So, how could there possibly be a majority anything except "Lefty sycophants" in positions of authority in the military or anything that influences the military?
Just like his "mentor General Petraeus, who never saw a conventional war he didn't like" (quoting the article).
If your place in history depends on successful nation-building in Islamic countries, trotting out an honest assessment of the religion (like, say, that of this 25-year-old war correspondent in 1899) would be ... impolitic.
wasn’t cenovich also responsible for spreading the jared-bannon fight story himself? He now claim it was overblown
I think its more likely Gorka and not Bannon. For Cenovich to be wrong about the nature of Jared-Bannon fight, it has to be from a 3rd person and not someone involved in it
Yes this
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.