Posted on 05/02/2017 8:13:29 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Again with the same question?
If you want to know why people hold the mainstream media in such low regard, here you go:
You’ve got an opportunity to interview the president of the United States, in the Oval Office. You could ask him about health care, energy policy, North Korea, Iran, taxes, spending . . . anything you want. So what does John Dickerson decide to ask him about? See for yourself:
We were screaming at the replay last night on CBS with Scott Pelley. That little runt Dickerson was RUDE, and he must think it’s normal to stand two inches from someone when speaking to them - what a creep.
Good for you President Trump, you don’t have to take these ‘butt lickers’ opinion over anything...if they can’t figure out it’s because they are still shoved up the Democrat Party Butts...
GO.PRESIDENT TRUMP.GO!!! MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Two bit punk. It looked as though Trump was ready to slug him.
MAGA!
And yet if Dickerson went after Hillary in the same manner he asked Trump to back up and clarify the claim, we’d be all over ourselves thankful the tough questions were asked.
Hillary is not President, she's a common criminal. President's deserve some modicum of respect, Dickerson showed no respect for the office or the man.
He asked about the wiretaps for those who don’t want to take the bait
I think we're pissed because Dickerson asked Trump to clarify and prove his claim and Trump is "our guy", not so much the question itself.
bfl
Not comparable at all, the press apologizes to Obama for asking easy softball questions without providing him the questions in advance, night and day.
The claim? Trump clearly was referring to the surveillance of him and anyone around him that is never discussed as a fact. We know it is a fact, yet the press doesn’t follow Obama and ask HIM why it was ongoing. They aren’t hounding Susan Rice, or Comey.
And we know that will NEVER happen.
That’s my point. It’s not the questions being posed. It’s who is being questioned in that manner and who isn’t. If the dems had questions like that, we’d be delighted.
“.......not so much the question itself”. .......
The little prick was arrogant, rude and deserved to be kicked out of the Oval Office. My guess is he won’t see the inside of that office again and good riddance!
That’s my point. It’s not the questions being posed. It’s who is being questioned in that manner and who isn’t. If the dems had questions like that, we’d be delighted.
So if he questions a dem president in the same manner, you wouldn’t be happy?
That’s my point. It’s not the questions being posed. It’s who is being questioned in that manner and who isn’t. If the dems had questions like that, we’d be delighted.
Seriously, man.....are you incapable of seeing the difference?????
SHHEEESH!
Explain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.