Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
Maryland pro-Confederates were strong in their support of secession and war against the United States, but they were a distinct minority, outnumbered about three-to-one by Unionists.

After Lincoln started arresting them, i'm sure many declared themselves to be against secession. Who can say what it would have been had Lincoln not arrested people?

25 posted on 04/15/2017 11:28:04 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp; DoodleDawg
DiogenesLamp: "After Lincoln started arresting them, i'm sure many declared themselves to be against secession.
Who can say what it would have been had Lincoln not arrested people?"

But of course we already know that answer, since the Legislature voted on April 29 -- before anybody was arrested and before the Confederacy formally declared war (May 6, 1861) -- Maryland's legislature voted four to one (53-13) against secession.

Remember, in every Southern state the vote for or against secession depended on how many slave-holders there were.
In states like Maryland slave-holders were a distinct minority and so no majority for secession was ever seen.
In Upper South states like Virginia & Tennessee slave-holder interests were the majority overall, but large regions opposed slavery and secession.
Hence, for examples, the state of West Virginia and Unionist East Tennessee.

26 posted on 04/15/2017 11:36:41 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson