Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the United Passenger Suckered Us
Canada Free Press ^ | 04/15/16 | Michael Fumento

Posted on 04/15/2017 6:22:19 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

But part of the phenomenon long precedes YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, and social media dictating the news. It's the American cult of victimization

You’ve been snookered folks! By that poor elderly doctor who was involuntarily dragged from his seat, had his face smashed in, and was beaten unconscious by the evil airport security at the behest of United Airlines.

Because there’s no evidence any of that was true. It was in fact a premeditated temper tantrum gone viral, comprising one 69-year-old Vietnamese-American David Dao, a medical doctor who lost his license, planning a lawsuit from the moment United first politely asked him to give up his seat. He demanded to be dragged, did an excellent impersonation of Ned Beatty’s character in that horrific scene in Deliverance, and struck his lip on an armrest. From the many videos taken by numerous passengers, obviously from numerous angles, there’s no evidence of a beating, a “serious” concussion, or bodily damage beyond that lip.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: abuse; customerassault; daviddao; lawsuit; luegenpresse; socialmedia; ual; unitedairlines; unitedthugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-407 next last
To: Fantasywriter

>>>I read an article that covered the term ‘boarding,’ yesterday, written for a law journal. I’ll take the info from that over the piece you’re promoting.>>>

Cool.


81 posted on 04/15/2017 8:33:20 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: vespa300
"You probably don’t fly much. Boarding is when the door closes and they tell you that. Until that door closes, all bets are off."

Maybe so ... maybe so ... but you have to admit that it that is not laid out clearly anywhere.

See, in my opinion, by the time that I've gotten to my seat, I've already turned in my boarding pass. To me, that means that I have completed boarding. If boarding was not completed until the door closed, shouldn't they have to wait until that point to collect boarding passes?

I mean, it's like if I went to a movie theater or a sporting event: I have a ticket and, until I turn that ticket in, they may be a chance for them to forbid me entrance (maybe they think the ticket is a forgery or something). But, once I've turned in that ticket and been granted entrance to the venue, I can only be removed for misconduct, not at the whim of the venue operators. I can't be accused of trespassing because they took my ticket/entry/boarding pass ... they gave me admission. After that point, other rules apply for my removal.

82 posted on 04/15/2017 8:33:29 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Ex Scientia Tridens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

Btw, welcome to FreeRepublic. Your last name isn’t Munoz, by any chance?


83 posted on 04/15/2017 8:33:55 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught owith pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

If nothing, these threads have exposed the sheep and the lemmings. The prone to collaboration with a Vichy or Quisling government. It is good to know who the turncoats will be.


84 posted on 04/15/2017 8:35:48 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Trump-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

>>>I have flown enough to know that once you’re on the plane, seated, they’ve taken your pass and scanned it.....you’re boarded.

Hell, in your world, I can see you advocating tossing a passenger out of a doorway,after liftoff, should the airline deem it so. >>>>

Let’s roll baby. Yeah, if the passenger poses a threat, causing danger to the plane with his unstable behavior, that fool is going. And you’ll be thanking me.


85 posted on 04/15/2017 8:35:55 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: marron

100% agreement.

He paid for that seat.
He was in that seat.

It was flight time.

The airline’s only option was asking for volunteers.

Like Reagan who once said “I paid for this microphone!”even though he didn’t own it, this man paid for his seat.


86 posted on 04/15/2017 8:36:19 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

>>>Btw, welcome to FreeRepublic. Your last name isn’t Munoz, by any chance?>>>

Oh gosh, another Nazi Freeper checking on profiles to see how long someone has been here. I dealt with like 3 of them last night. Creepy........checking people’s history and profiles. LOL.....weird stalking like creepy stuff.


87 posted on 04/15/2017 8:37:33 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
They had to travel to do their jobs. Other flights depended on them getting to the destination inside federally regulated time limits. It was United who had to meet the federal regs that required the employees to travel.

I would argue that the airline knew well in advance that those employees would have to travel to another airport and should have made arrangements to get them there without bumping paying passengers from the plane. There are some flights where there are few passengers--United couldn't have flown them on the "red-eye" to get them there?

88 posted on 04/15/2017 8:43:07 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

No other removals seem to have reached this particular level of violence, coercion, publicity or tone deaf official response from an airline. None have been so widely videoed and publicized. This is new territory and is a huge black eye for the industry. UA will have to settle big and not allow a trial, which will expose more to the public.


89 posted on 04/15/2017 8:45:10 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Trump-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

You’re been here less than a week and you’re calling me a Nazi?

Wow.

How about this: see if you can locate a definition of ‘Godwin’s Law.’

Because you just stepped in it.


90 posted on 04/15/2017 8:47:58 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught owith pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

“By the way, according to this article, they take it even further. As long as the plane hasn’t left the “gate” .......they can deny boarding.”

The article you cite from April 10 was obviously another poorly researched article from someone with no legal training - before United started its backtracking in light of someone actually analyzing their contract and how fouled up their procedures are.

With respect to “boarding” and the position that somehow the common understanding as an act of personally going onboard a vessel (not collectively - not at the whim of the common carrier when the gangplank is lifted or the door closed) is incorrect, United’s CEO Munoz’s statement is the end of the matter:
“On Sunday, April 9, after United Express Flight 3411 was fully boarded, United’s gate agents were approached by crewmembers that were told they needed to board the flight.”

The article, again written before saner heads had considered the actual obligations of United, described the situation as “an oversold flight” - which it was not - and goes downhill from there.


91 posted on 04/15/2017 8:50:18 AM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: LibertyOh

A dispassionate examination of this episode has to conclude that UA has suffered a massive wound. Self inflicted and costly. Either through arrogance or incompetence, UA is going to suffer greatly. Its competition will surely make the best of UA’s stupidity.


92 posted on 04/15/2017 8:51:25 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Trump-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

>>>>You’re been here less than a week and you’re calling me a Nazi?

Wow.>>>>

You started it with your tone and then went to check on my profile to see how long I was here. People do that when they get desperate and lose on facts. I find it creepy.

And I was here before you were a gleam in your Daddy’s eye I’m just back. So there’s that. Go back and check your tone with me and me with you.


93 posted on 04/15/2017 8:51:44 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Easy. We have been told everyone is a victim and no one is responsible for anything. It is always someone else that caused the problem. That way maybe one day I will get rich without doing anything. The mindset of many today.


94 posted on 04/15/2017 8:51:51 AM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300
-- They do this on every American Airlines Flight, which is what i fly. So for the industry.....the term "boarded" may mean the door is closed and there's no going back. --

I don't think that "already boarded, can't be removed" nit matters at all in this case, or in any other one, as a practical matter.

Either way, the passenger is delayed. And either way, they can refuse the Rule 25 compensation and sue for actual damages. For the amount of money involved in actual damages (setting the beating aside as not administered by the airline), not many lawyers are going to take the case. The three cases I know of are Nader, a retired Illinois Supreme Court judge by the name of Kluczynski, and an aviation lawyer by the name of Thatcher A. Stone.

95 posted on 04/15/2017 8:51:58 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

So, Sean, what are your thoughts on the subject?


96 posted on 04/15/2017 8:54:21 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Reset Underway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

Get used to it. DUmmies like to sign up and instigate. If you are permitted to stick around long enough, you may learn a few things. If you don’t, oh well. Such is life. You may well learn that the owners of this site have property rights, too.


97 posted on 04/15/2017 8:55:06 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Trump-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: LibertyOh

>>>The article you cite from April 10 was obviously another poorly researched article from someone with no legal training - before United started its backtracking in light of someone actually analyzing their contract and how fouled up their procedures are.>>>

I’m pretty sure every article you disagree with is a “poorly researched article.”

I may find yours to be poorly researched. Human nature I guess. But facts are facts. Airlines kick people off of planes all the time. Because they can and it’s legal, as the article says. The poorly researched one.


98 posted on 04/15/2017 8:56:38 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

What’s creepy is calling a person a Nazi. My “tone” is a figment of your imagination. My first two posts to you were polite and factual. In the third I asked if your name is Munoz. If that works you into a lather, you’re too sensitive for the normal give and take of online discussions.


99 posted on 04/15/2017 8:57:47 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught owith pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

Unless the person you are responding to is 20 years old, you haven’t been “here” long enough. FR does have retreads. Many are those banned or suspended. For various reasons. What was your infraction. (Though, I can surmise from your attitude.)


100 posted on 04/15/2017 8:58:40 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Trump-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-407 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson