Skip to comments.
Hot take--Mother Jones editor in chief: Those missiles we lobbed at Syria were totes racist
Canada Free Press ^
| 04/11/17
| Robert Laurie
Posted on 04/11/2017 10:58:20 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
The official missile of the Washington Redskins
If youre a bleeding-heart leftist whos incapable of making a tough call, you probably would never bomb someone because you think its the height of insensitivity. After all, the person managing the chemical weapons on the receiving end of your attack could be a member of a protected racial group, a potential illegal immigrant voter, or possibly even transgender. You just never know.
TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: americanindians; clarajeffery; cruisemissiles; iran; lebanon; motherjones; nevertrumpers; racist; russia; syria
To: Sean_Anthony
If youre a bleeding-heart leftist whos incapable of making a tough call, you probably would never bomb someone because you think its the height of insensitivity. After all, the person managing the chemical weapons on the receiving end of your attack could be a member of a protected racial group, a potential illegal immigrant voter, or possibly even transgender.
This is very dangerous nonsense. I know that the author is trying to be funny, but humor without underlying truth is just stupidity.
The truth of the matter is that the left are not "bleeding-heart". They are highly insensitive, when it serves their purpose. And most importantly, they could not care less about people of other racial groups, illegal aliens, transgenders, or any other member of a group that they use as political pawns. The left would be the first to line them up against the wall, if it served their purposes.
The left are power-hungry globalists. Everything else is just rhetoric, and strategy. Their real enemy are members the traditional American culture, because that is the only group big enough, and strong enough, to thwart their long-term plans. Had Obama done what Trump did, they would have been the first to proclaim its brilliance. But since it was Trump, they will use any tool in their political and cultural toolbag to portray the action as pure evil (what Trump did was stupid, but not evil).
One of the biggest problems we have is that so many on our side refuse to see the left as anything other than misguided dolts. Their useless idiots might be, but there is intelligence behind everything they do.
Of course, judging by the 3-d chess fanatics who cannot wave their pompoms fast enough to celebrate everything that Trump does, maybe we shouldn't be too quick to judge their base ...
To: Sean_Anthony
3
posted on
04/11/2017 11:22:13 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: jjsheridan5
Exchanges of military nature are by their very nature not “politically correct”. Think of it as some rather stern form of diplomacy, in which the assertion is made, “We are not bluffing.”
Calling a bluff about the other side being a “protected” class is not necessarily hostile, it is a way to clear the air and start discussing the realities of the situation.
4
posted on
04/11/2017 11:30:48 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(A really well polished insult sounds almost like a compliment in the ears of the recipient.)
To: Sean_Anthony
So, Mother Jones’ position is that it’s OK to use chemical weapons on civilians if you have above-Caucasion melanin content!?
And these commies claim they are going to do communism differently than Stalin and Mao. LOL
5
posted on
04/11/2017 2:35:55 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Make up my mind, NBC,CBS,CNN,ABC. What are the "facts" today?)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson