Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Vince Ferrer
"This could be the result of the woman who left the White House. If they have found the leaker, Bannon’s role may not be required."

In the article linked from Drudge's headline, it says that Bannon was on the committee as a check against Michael Flynn. He's gone now. Bannon only attended one meeting, and felt he wasn't needed in that role anymore since H.R. McMaster was chosen as National Security Advisor. Bannon wanted McMaster in the role, and McMaster was given the authority to reorganize the committee, which he has. I see Drudge is saying Rick Perry will fill Bannon's place.

Of course the press is going to make a big to-do about it. No matter what happens in this White House, the media is going to make it look like it's because of tension, bad feelings, power struggle, yada, yada, yada.

7 posted on 04/05/2017 11:33:00 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mass55th

Rick Perry is because of Energy Dept.

Good shake up , eye on Target and USA interest only.


9 posted on 04/05/2017 11:37:12 AM PDT by jennychase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: mass55th
In the article linked from Drudge's headline, it says that Bannon was on the committee as a check against Michael Flynn.

Why would Trump nominate Flynn but trust him so little as to put a babysitter with him? Frankly, if that spin is true, it's way more disturbing than "you know what, I made a mistake. Bannon doesn't belong there."

15 posted on 04/05/2017 12:55:53 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson