Posted on 03/31/2017 8:22:22 PM PDT by huldah1776
If this fully goes ahead the Washington swamp may be drained.
Fish is no doubt a retread, he accused Sessions of being a traitor and voting for the Iran deal, which was utterly disproved here, I posted that article March 28 to clear the matter. Others stepped up and cleared it all up. I couldn’t let a filthy lie go unchallenged.
Sessions on Iran deal: ‘I think it’s a mistake’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3538896/posts
And yet he voted yea on it -- H.R. 1191 As Amended.
Further, I believe the others are wrong -- the Senate doesn't need to give itself permission for "oversight" they're the damn Senate and the Constitution clearly gives them the authority to block treaties -- moreover you simply cannot concur
with something that doesn't yet exist.
At the very best the Senate was horrendously derelict in its duties, at worst (and, as I am convinced,) they are traitors.
Time is short, I have no time to get into circular debates with people whose motives and honesty are suspect and seem to have lost much of their use of reason.
Do you need to review what pizzagate is?
I've not been dishonest with you, period -- I've explained my viewpoints and reasoning.
I realize we have differing viewpoints, that is all well and fine -- what is not fine is your claim against my character.
You should not do that; it is unbecoming and reflects poorly on yourself.
Your posting reveals much about your ‘character’. I’ve been around here for a long time ... you have a certain ‘smell’ about you; not the sweet odor of a Conservative Freeper.
Any murdered there???
Well then, go make one, CITEZEN! Whatever that is.
Are pedophiles known for murdering their victims?
That's funny, I seem to recall you and I getting along fairly well past-times.
I don’t know, BUT Mrs. Ben Ghazi slaughtered four (4) Americans cold blooded there, hmm !!!
I didn’t say Clinton would be off the hook for the Benghazi deaths, I said Gowdy would be off the hook for doing the phony Benghazi hearing if he makes real moves on pizzagagte.
So you are a retread ...
I’ve always been open and honest about this being a new handle — something that is denied in the subtext of “retread”, is it not?
(i.e. “retread” implies a measure of guile or deception, right?)
Thou sayest ...
>> I’ve always been open and honest about this being a new handle — something that is denied in the subtext of “retread”, is it not?
>> (i.e. “retread” implies a measure of guile or deception, right?)
>
> Thou sayest ...
Then, if I am honest in my dealings, is calling me a “retread” accurate?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.