Posted on 03/30/2017 12:38:47 PM PDT by PROCON
AG Sessions must know this law as well as any lawyer.
Why then is he and President Trump not calling this judge out and ignoring this judicial tyranny?
The worst repercussion is the precedent it sets for further usurpations down the road.
The Constitution now says whatever the hell five out of nine Supreme Court Justices want it to say.
It’s making our muzzie invaders more comfortable, don’t you know? It is also a hindrance to our national security.
But who the hell cares as long as the muzzies are happy.
You have to pull the rubber back on a slingshot before letting go of it; he’s just pulling it back IMHO.
“Why then is he and President Trump not calling this judge out and ignoring this judicial tyranny?”
That just might be the question of the year! What is the history, if any, on Federal judges stopping an executive order, which for the record should only apply to the executive branch of the government.
Why aren’t we hearing about any appeals on this? Are they not happening, or just not being reported? Or are they waiting for Gorsuch? In theory, I’m okay with the President ignoring judicial decrees that usurp his constitutional authority but, in practice, it would create chaos. In this instance it remains best to work it out through the judicial system.
Our best hope is that Sessions is working round the clock in coordinating action plans to begin a massive corruption probe that reaches deep into the pockets of the real haters&rat financial supporters in this land.
..or better yet, Spend this weekend signing the arrest warrants for the leadership of the Dem party. Quit messing with this nation’s future by allowing rats any say in its direction. RICO their arses!!
Every move they have made the last 50 years has inflicted great societal and fiscal losses across the board, while their supporters grew fatter and even more arrogant in thier actions.
He won’t defy the judges until he has Gorsuch in place.
It’s time to tell the little President Hawaiian judge to go self copulate.
The next lib prez will do anything he/she wants precedent or not. Trump might as well be the one to start guiding the boat in the right direction.
I'm fairly convinced this will happen.
What then?
How much crap should the President take?
Yup, and somebody better point this out to him... fast.
For some odd reason, I feel as if President Trump may be baiting a trap, which is soon going to spring.
So now some Judge will stop the Sanctuary city crackdown and some other Judge will stop the building of the Wall. What is the point of having a President? Look at all the money we could save with no Congress, who needs them?
This is all wrong and what happens when the new Supreme Court Judge disappoints everybody and votes with the Liberals on all this. It is way past time for Trump and Sessions to show the courage of their beliefs and stand up to these Judges.
Separation of powers. What ever is done must be by the book to avoid the appearance of Executive tyranny, even in the efface of judicial tyranny.
Good question. I think you’re right. Some judge or six will say that the Feds can’t withhold funds from sanctuary cities. The judiciary is way stacked against Trump. And I’m inclined to think he doesn’t have nearly enough of his team in place to adequately fight them all in court. It’s gonna be one helluva slog.
even in the face of judicial tyranny.
I don’t know where that extra ef came from!
I hope he has a trump card, so to speak, up his sleeve.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.