Skip to comments.
Old And Busted: There Was No Wiretap. New Hotness: Trump Declassified Sensitive Information
RedState ^
| March 5, 2017
Posted on 03/05/2017 7:37:56 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
President Carter did that by mentioning certain Keyhole (satellite) systems when I was in the intelligence game.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
media is getting the vapors, oh dear!
2
posted on
03/05/2017 7:40:00 PM PST
by
drewh
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Anyone who would reveal the existence of a wiretap would violate federal law, he said. It is against federal law to disclose the existence of a wiretap, whether that wiretap is for criminal purposes or intelligence purposes.
Can it be mentioned without penalty after someone else mentions it first ?
Like assuming the NYTimes article of 1/19/2017 is true ?
3
posted on
03/05/2017 7:42:13 PM PST
by
stylin19a
(Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If this is the latest defense of Obama’s lawlessness, that it is unlawful to disclose that you were targeted by lawlessness by the government, then the media is forever lost.
4
posted on
03/05/2017 7:43:09 PM PST
by
blackdog
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think he should and go back and look at Iraq while you are at it.
5
posted on
03/05/2017 7:43:38 PM PST
by
dila813
(Voting for Trump to Punish Trumpets!)
To: stylin19a
It would be epic justice if an editor and writer at the SLIMES went to prison for this.
6
posted on
03/05/2017 7:44:42 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Hey, traitor Democrats. I have a tree. I'm sure another FReeper has a rope.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Aw baloney!
If the government wiretapped me and I found out about it, I would shout it out to the world. The First Amendment of the Constitution says that I can.
7
posted on
03/05/2017 7:44:46 PM PST
by
meyer
(The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“If any other government employee had single-handedly made such revelations they could see prison time for potentially damaging U.S. national security”
Unless he was a Democrat.
8
posted on
03/05/2017 7:45:48 PM PST
by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Perhaps Clapper denied it because he was not allowed to confirm. That appears to be the law. Only the Prez can declassify.
9
posted on
03/05/2017 7:45:59 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Hey, traitor Democrats. I have a tree. I'm sure another FReeper has a rope.)
To: drewh
Your Vapors image just about wraps it up. That was a fun little piece. Appreciate the post, 2nd Division
10
posted on
03/05/2017 7:46:36 PM PST
by
StAntKnee
(Add your own danged sarc tag)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think we’ve reached the point where every political figure and media hack inside the Beltway would rather eat a swimming pool full of horse crap than admit that Trump was objectively truthful in one of his hilarious Twitter messages.
11
posted on
03/05/2017 7:47:24 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 characters at a time.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Anyone who would reveal the existence of a wiretap would violate federal law, he said. It is against federal law to disclose the existence of a wiretap, whether that wiretap is for criminal purposes or intelligence purposes. But, Hillary did that exact thing in her October 31 tweet.
12
posted on
03/05/2017 7:47:53 PM PST
by
Baynative
( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Apparently President Trump is the only one that can expose the truth to the American People about Obama’s misdeeds as President!
13
posted on
03/05/2017 7:48:15 PM PST
by
aynrandfreak
(Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
To: doug from upland
OUR president needs to crack down very hard and very soon. No mercy.
14
posted on
03/05/2017 7:48:37 PM PST
by
WENDLE
(Watch this on John McCain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO0mHEJyC3Y)
To: meyer
That may be true, unless you signed the document required to work in the intelligence field.
15
posted on
03/05/2017 7:49:06 PM PST
by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: meyer
"If the government wiretapped me and I found out about it, I would shout it out to the world. The First Amendment of the Constitution says that I can."The restriction applies to those who have security clearance. Even if they see a secret revealed in the media, they cannot confirm it or talk about it.
To: stylin19a
17
posted on
03/05/2017 7:49:44 PM PST
by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Good thing Hillary never released any secret intelligence.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
So let’s see: it’s OK if the media/deep state leaks inside, private, or classified info to the press... as long as you don’t mention the use of wiretapping. OK, got it!
19
posted on
03/05/2017 7:50:43 PM PST
by
drierice
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Actually it was Hillary last year who tweeted out the existance of the wiretap...
20
posted on
03/05/2017 7:50:54 PM PST
by
piasa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson