It’s worth research.
We need to get over our CO2 panic, however, if we want to make, er, liberal use of this. Will the globe, upon seeing all the new CO2 here, spiral up in temperatures so high that it would render the planet unlivable?
There seem to be many clues that it won’t. CO2 is yummies for green plants, among other things. And green plants are yummies for fauna. By simple gas laws, CO2 would be expected to have a mild, but not wild, effect on world temperatures — hardly the sudden deluges and droughts envisioned in an Al Gore scenario. The earth seems to have a way of putting up reflective and shading clouds when it is getting hotter, too. It would be as if it had been engineered to be resilient to fluctuating CO2, and that (in an old earth local chronology) for billions of years. Good enough that some of those very earliest life forms are still with us.
In essence, CO2 “IS” green energy.
While we're at it, scientists have also found hydrocarbons well beneath the earth's mantle, way, way below the habitation zone.
In the last two days or so there have been news stories about a giant lake of carbon under the Western U.S. That's a hella lot of dead dinos.
Fossil fuels are simply millions of years of solar energy storage
I’m not sure the abiotic theory explains why oil is generally found in geologic basins.
Natural Gas bump
ping