Posted on 02/07/2017 8:41:11 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The University of California Berkeley newspaper The Daily Californian published a series of columns Tuesday that praised the riot that shut down Breitbart writer Milo Yiannopouloss speech last week.
Headlined as Violence as Self-Defense, the series was intended to give a voice to those who thought the multiple assaults and serious property damage committed in the name of cancelling Milo were 100 percent right.
The first op-ed, written by UC Berkekely alumna Nisa Dang, lectured critics of the riots to check their privilege. Dang claimed that Yiannopouloss views amount to violence, and that in turn legitimized violence against them.
Criticisms of the riots are not just wrong, in her opinion, but also constitute violent acts against minority students.
To people with platforms who decide when a protest should and should not be violent: You speak from a place of immense privilege. As I recently wrote in a tirade against this brand of idiocy, asking people to maintain peaceful dialogue with those who legitimately do not think their lives matter is a violent act, the irate alumna wrote.
She blamed the police presence for somehow influencing the demonstrators to grow more violent and dismissed those who were assaulted by the rioters as white nationalists [who] got their asses beat.
She also implied in her piece that Milo and his supporters should be killed.
Heres a big f*** you from the descendants of people who survived genocides by killing Nazis and people just like them, Dang said in reference to Yiannopoulos.
The next column, written by an illegal immigrant student named Juan Prieto, argued that the riots actually ensured the safety of students. Prieto claims that Yiannopoulos having a chance to speak would make all illegal alien students subject to violence.
My campus did nothing to stand between my undocumented community and the hateful hands of radicalized white men the AntiFas [anti-fascists] did, he wrote. A peaceful protest was not going to cancel that event Only the destruction of glass and shooting of fireworks did that. The so-called violence against private property that the media seems so concerned with stopped white supremacy from organizing itself against my community.
He then castigated any condemnation of the riots as passive acceptance to hate speech.
In the following article, former student columnist Neil Lawrence identifies himself as one of the black bloc rioters and pushed back against the idea that his fellow demonstrators were outside agitators. (RELATED: Famous Berkeley Prof Suggests That Violent Protesters At Milo Event Were Right-Wing Plants)
We were not, as the news, the chancellor and concerned progressives have alleged, unaffiliated white anarchists. Behind those bandanas and black T-shirts were the faces of your fellow UC Berkeley and Berkeley City College students, of women, of people of color, of queer and trans people. The bloc was made up of people with the most to fight for and the most to lose, Lawrence wrote.
He argued that what the rioters did was self-defense against the violence of Milos words.
The next columnist, Desmond Meagley, also supported the use of violence to challenge the alleged violence of Yiannopouloss views and claimed there were many students among the black bloc rioters.
I put my safety and my freedom on the line because letting Yiannopoulos speak was more terrifying to me than potential injury or arrest, Meagley states. While defending the violence, he also curiously claims that the rioters did not start the fires on campus.
But he did declare that criticizing the protests was the same as condoning hate speech.
The final op-ed in the series, written by Berkeley student Josh Hardman, took the most moderate stance of the bunch as it didnt fully endorse last weeks violence. However, Hardman argued that Yiannopouloss hate speech should not be covered by freedom of speech and he was pleased he was not allowed to speak.
I urge you to consider whether damaging the windows of places like banks and the Amazon student store constitutes violence and, if so, what weight this violence carries in the context of the symbolic, structural and actual violence that is proposed, condoned and actioned by the likes of Milo Yiannopoulos and his supporters, the student concludes his op-ed.
On the day before Yiannopoulos was scheduled to speak, The Daily Californian had urged all of their fellow students to protest his talk in an editorial. (RELATED: The Cal Berkeley Student Newspaper PROMOTED Protest-Turned-Riot The Day Before Milo Event)
While rioters were able to prevent Yiannopoulos from speaking on campus, at the same time the Breitbart writers book shot back up to number 1 on Amazon and gained increased national exposure due to the violence.
These people are insane.
They are going to start a civil war using logic like this. It’s inevitable, and it doesn’t matter who we elect.
We are going to end it.
By their “logic”...their words are VIOLENCE against everyone who doesn’t agree with them. Ergo, all of us should now be able to set everything they own aflame and beat the living crap out of these little snowflakes.
Nisa is both very educated and very stupid. You can be both at once and not even know it.
“A craftsman made it, so it is not God; Surely the calf of Samaria will be broken to pieces. For they sow the wind, and they reap the whirlwind.”
Correct. There's no other word for it.
They are going to start a civil war using logic like this. Its inevitable, and it doesnt matter who we elect.
Correct. And the delusional hate-mongers will have made a breathtaking miscalculation regarding whose side is going to have the overwhelming numbers.
We are going to end it.
Correct again. And only at that late moment will the Enemy finally begin to grasp the magnitude of their folly...
"Front sight, front sight, front sight."
[[(Violence as Self-Defense)]]
So apparently they had no problem with the abortion clinic bomber who claimed the same thing then huh? (Claimed he was defending through violence, the unborn)
Eventually there will have to be a reckoning with the Federal lawbreakers. Federal law is being systematically violated with the whole “sanctuary city “ concept. Law enforcement in those areas are being forced to violate their oaths. Constitutional rights are being infringed at state universities with speech codes, restricted zones and state sponsored violence where state officials refuse to curtail violence directed against political classes and individuals. Trump has much on his plate but the lawbreakers must be taken down.
It’s called given over to a reprobate mindset.
Domestic terrorist Nisa Dang has some dang big teeth!
It’s obvious Democrats are terrorists now. What other evidence do we need?
According to Nisa Dang’s FB page she is a field organizer for the Nevada State Democratic Party. Her photos are interesting. When she isn’t struggling for the liberation of the oppressed, she seems to live a very — dare I say it —PRIVELEGED lifestyle.
Your OPINION is now violence...
soon it will be "your opinion, whether expressed or not, is violence, and thus we may attack you"
I thank God on a regular basis that I didn’t go to mainstream university and chose instead to work on a business. I have a great solid stable work history and a great work ethic that feels very natural to me. Zero student loan debt and zero major regrets in life.
Nisa Dang: “Traveled to Washington DC, New York City, Israel, and the West Bank to meet with top politicians.”
Wonder where a young college students with massive tuition bills gets the money for her international travels? Maybe she works at two coffee shops. Or maybe she is dependent on a donor.
Liberal/Leftism is for the criminally insane.
I say we nuke Berkeley from orbit.
All in favor, raise your hands.
The sane people have voted and the “Yes” votes win.
Let the bombings begin in 5 minutes.
It’s the only way to be sure. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.