[Daniel Ramsey]

Fake news to sow discord.

[Alberta's Child]

It's more than a little pathetic to see how much grief I've gotten here on FreeRepublic when I've suggested that Jared Kushner isn't someone I would ever trust in a government position.

I hope he goes back to New York City with Ivanka next week, and we never hear from either of them again.

[savagesusie]

You know....the control of “words” just is so important to the Narrative.

There is no such thing as “LBB&**&^%^*(....” “rights” The only “Rights” that all of us have are Natural Rights from God. There can be no “Justice” (virtue) system in the USA if “laws” promote evil, irrational behaviors (socialism, welfare/slavery has to go, too, since it embeds dependency and destroys virtue formation in children).

Just Laws are based on the Laws of Nature and nature’s God (Objective Truth).

The only non-sexist system which confers the Natural rights to the baby is the one based on the man/woman paradigm, where the child has a better chance at being created by an act of TRUE LOVE. The patriarchy creates the only “unity” possible with the diverse nature of male and female...there is no such thing as “Equal” or “The Same”.

Homosexual “unions” are evil, and dysfunctional, defy science and destroy Natural Rights of any child stripped from the people meant to love and bond with them. They will not understand reality as God designed it; they won’t be capable of common sense.

Marriage-—the word is DESTROYED by SCOTUS 5, who need to be put in prison for Treason. They literally destroyed a fundamental institution to Life and order, so childhood could be destroyed and hyper-sexualized: they literally made marriage meaningless—because that is how the Marxists can flip 2000 years of Good and Evil, so Satanism (their religion) becomes embedded in little children, and evil will always collapse civil society.

[Java4Jay]

Once you give someone a right, its hard to take it back.

[fwdude]

I'd like to pose the question: What, exactly, would happen to these sexual degenerates if Obama's "non-discrimination" executive order were reversed? Would homos be fired by the truckloads? Would they be hanged from bridges? Would they be banned anywhere?

These stupid "non-discrimination" edicts are always solutions in desperate search of the non-existent problem. There is probably no significant number of people who identify as "gay" who weren't hired or served until this order was made. If people are valuable to a company, having the skills and knowledge a company needs, they'll get hired for economic reasons despite any unobtrusive quirk of "gayness" or femininity/butchness.

If they are NOT unobtrusive, then there is good reason not to hire them.

[Degaston]

I’m so sick and tired of people discriminating against LGBT people for whatever they do in their personal lives. What they do in their bedrooms is their business with themselves, God, and their religious leaders. If we allow government to control their bedrooms or tolerate them being bullied then we are no better than the Taliban.

[Sir Napsalot]

What happened to the hundreds of lawmakers we elected in, if they are not too busy?

[Dawgreg]

Uh, I think those two should go back to New York. Hopefully President Trump will get the message from the voters who put him there and not the leftist leanings of some in his family....

[ZULU]

So what? Trump +99, -1.

In addition, conservative Court judges will eventually overturn it.

In the big picture, it is inconsequential.

[x]

Something President Trump wasn’t going to do anyway. Fake news.

[Rastus]

An absolutely transparent attempt on the part of the media to peel conservative support from President Trump. Float some bogus executive order he never even considered, and then pretend he was talked down by his family. My reaction? FUMSM.

[connyankee]

President Trump stated in his inauguration speech that he is for the protection and rights of every American including lgbtq etc. It’s a non-issue