Posted on 10/24/2016 7:31:57 AM PDT by justlurking
There are a few interesting tweets by James O'Keefe in his Twitter feed:
More HRC evidence coming soon. Drip... Drip... Drip...
This one was tweeted on 10/22, but has been "pinned" to the top. It contains a video of Trump on CNN, saying "Sex assault accusers: They lied and will be sued"
Do you think this is implying that O'Keefe has evidence that Clinton's campaign was involved in this deception?
These are related to this:
Trump Filing Lawsuit Against Clinton Over Organized DNC Violence
The new Veritas video should be up at 12:00 EDT today. I guess I should start popping popcorn.
We are long past due for criminal recriminations against the Clinton cabal. That a preponderance of otherwise nice citizens support her is a testament to the effective application of doublethink and Ministry of Truth tactics.
The DNC was undoubtedly involved in bringing forth these accusers NOW.
It would not surprise me to learn (if I cared) that he actually did one or two or three of these gropes.
I don’t think there’s any way to prove that half a dozen of them DID NOT happen. I don’t think there’s any way to prove that half a dozen of them DID happen.
I myself don’t think he’s doing himself much of a favor going after these gals. The Chicago protestors, now that is a different story and potentially a juicy one.
Sure, evidence that her campaign was involved in these protests could do the DNC some damage down the road.
But how is this going to hurt Hillary when none of the other treasonous activity has?
The Clinton Cabal is basically the DNC. Clintons, Democrat Party - same difference.
Yes, if you were around in the 1980s men did do a lot of groping. Not Clinton style dropping their pants; that is a rather pervy level. But “making a pass” kind of thing. He was a billionaire player. I do not care. He has proven he is fair and not condescending to women, even before he ran for office.
I’m also willing to be that these ‘gropes’ were consensual.
Yeah, he should not defend himself and just say nothing thereby admitting guilt. By going after these "gals," some of whom are porn stars, he is sending the message that it will cost them money to defend themselves in court and that anyone else thinking about coming forward should be prepared to be sued, including having their lives scrutinized by the public.
You seem to be buying the message of this orchestrated attempt to defame Trump. Words don't equal action. In the case of Bill Clinton, the actions speak for themselves.
Notice a total MSM blackout of the NE story on the sexcapades of Hillary and Bill. The accusations are not given the same weight or credibility. Yet, Trump's accusers have no proof whatsoever that these actions took place.
Someone else noted that, in the context, the correct word is “seduce”. Few ask formalized permission prior to suggestive touching when pursuing further intimacy.
Exactly. Have those women prove (if Trump did anything, which I doubt) how the accused conduct was anything different than what thousands of so-called “pick up artists” do at nightclubs daily.
It looks to me like the National Enqirer story was a warning shot. It was just playing a Trump card and it’s still on the table.
Right let lies stand? I would love to read the depositions in the cases. I think liars need to be prosecuted and as a female I say go after them!
“You seem to be buying the message of this orchestrated attempt to defame Trump.”
No, I actually do not care about the gropes or non gropes. Those were gropier times, not to excuse the boorish behavior. But it’s long ago and far away and to think these women are or were permanently damaged is far fetched. Rape, assault, exposure as BJClinton did, whole different story.
I only care/comment about what gets DJT elected. If these women were interested in shaming Trump for his money, he’s been well known as a billionaire for perhaps 2 decades and they should have attacked him them. Now, what’s clear, is that they have been induced to come forward with the promise of money from the DNC as pawns.
The DNC was undoubtedly involved in bringing forth these accusers NOW.
I think all of them were of the Clinton campaign.
What does it say about a person (Hillary Clinton) when she uses the “Sexual Assault” trick when there are so many women out there who really were sexually assaulted. It’s difficult enough for a woman to come out and charge that their boss or someone in a position of authority or even a stranger raped them because they fear not being taken seriously or being called a liar. What does it say about a woman who will exploit such a serious crime and knowingly cry wolf about such a crime in the name of politics?
Any O’Keefe updates?
I just watched a nothing burger listed on Twitter as #3. It was not nearly as substantial as #1. I trust I missed someting.
Quack Quack. It is a duck. I just watched #3 which links Clinton and Brazille directly with their PACs. O’Keefe shows continuous supervision by the Clinton campaign with PACS, a violation of federal campaign finance law.
Lock her up.
He tied top people to the scam...
Here’s something you might enjoy... Anderson Cooper did a nice piece on Veritas reporting - calls it damning... pulled it all together.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ1qT-XtNk0
Anderson Cooper Calls Project Veritas Action Videos “Damning”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.