You may have me confused with a proponent. I am not, for the same reason you stated.
Sorry...not directed specifically at you. While I see potential benefits to an Article V convention, one of my concerns is the question I posited and I would like to hear from the hardcore supporters on it, so in that sense, my question was thrown out there for anybody who cared to answer it. Our founders were pretty clear that the Constitution was workable only for a moral society and would not work for any other. We can amend all we want, but those amendments are only as good as the people who are willing to obey and enforce them. They could be ignored just as the powers that be already selectively ignore the clauses and amendments they choose to now.