EMB, if you think, perhaps, that you are being ignored, well, you would be very close to being spot on.
If you haven’t had a chance to review the IAP seminars conducted by Drs Peter Hagelstein and Mitchell Schwartz at MIT, then please take my recommendation and reserve a couple days to go over the videos of those events. You will at least know what *is* known about this field, and what devices show promise and also demonstrate positive indications of this phenom.
I don’t know the length and breadth of your technical education especially as it relates to physics and nuclear physics and test/measurement methodologies in particular; these are prerequisites short of buying shrink-wrapped, bubble-packed ‘working’ products off a stocked shelf at Wal-Mart in getting a ‘handle’ on whether this is real or quote simple instrumental error unquote or “synchronized mass delusion” by all who participated in this research.
If you are JUST coming on the scene and haven’t been following the efforts of John Spzack or Pamela Mosier-Boss, over the years, I can see where you might be at a disadvantage compared to some of us who have been following the efforts and research in this field.
Pam Mosier-Boss’ CR-39 technique for detecting neutron production is especially intriguing and convincing to me in particular. She has previously published and presented on this subject, too.
That doesn’t bother me, being ignored is a step up from the usual personal attacks. I find it extremely ironic that pro-science people tell you you’re an idiot if you don’t turn off your brain and BELIEVE.
Here’s my problem: work in this field has been ongoing for 25 years and nobody can show me so much as a desktop lamp powered by it. You’re not gonna win a lot of converts when somebody says “Show me” and all you can do is point them to a mountain of paperwork that’s accumulated for 25 years. Am I going to live long enough to see something useful produced?