[wastedyears]

I still don’t believe he’s going to hand over power.

[null and void]

I watched in mounting horror as google systematically and deliberately ‘disappeared’ half a million hits on image searches for ‘obama birth certificate’ in mid-July 2007.

I don’t use google to this day.

[butlerweave]

Just another reason not to trust and use Google

[SkyDancer]

Just wondering that other than liberals, who uses Google searches? I guess they’re doing what the American MSMLSD crowd uses called “selective editing” or “filtering” ... so our sensibilities aren’t threatened and have to go to the fainting couch.

[longfellow]

The fact that they are trying to hide it proves there is something to it.

[MarchonDC09122009]

I just made a comparison of all four major US Internet search engines and here’s what I found when searching on: “Hillary Clinton Health” ranked according to LEAST bias (pro / con balance) for the first page of results:
1. Startpage.com (anonymized Google search engine database) resulted in the least biased results, placing the Wikileaks Hillary Health news story right on the top line of the first page.

2. Dogpile.com - included Wikileaks HRC Health news story

3. Duckduckgo.com - did not include Wikileaks HRC news story

4. Bing.com (resulted in whitewashed pro-Hillary news stories, ie: Snopes debunking, HRC appearance on Jimmy Kimmel show).

I’m using Mozilla Firefox browser, strong privacy settings (no cookies or cached history data), VPN.

The Google search engine database still remains the most comprehensive in my experience and opinion.

ALWAYS use strong privacy browser settings & Startpage.com to ensure Google does not record your search engine interests.

Google is strong and evil.

[I want the USA back]

Just went to Google. Typed in “hilla” and this came up:
Hillary health concerns
Hillary seizures
Hillary health seizures

Every time someone does one of those searches, it makes it more likely that they come up.
Do it.
Check out the Wikileaks article.
Do it.