Btw..since you were victim of faal...what is your assessment of motive and who pays for his antics.
Is he a disinformation specialist or a nutcase hoaxer?.
Since people here keep falling for sorcha faal..they would be better of trying to get to the bottom of who or what he is..
.david booth...Rachel booth...j forrest Sharpe.?????..etc
“What is your assessment of motive”
Case in point:
My unique studies, on earth related seismic phenomenon, “booming sounds”, were presented as proof (in Sorcha’s story) for a connection in events that led to a conclusion the story wanted to achieve.
Thus the story had huge holes in actual proof. Instead of writing the story with a question to a possible association or explanation, the story(stories) were written as “proof” to a conclusion.
When a story has events that have “possible associations” or links to the overall event, this needs to be stated. A “possibility” tree thus develops as branches in the ultimate conclusion. Therefore a reader would be able to assess the probability of the solidness of the conclusion.
But, if it is inferred to be “matter-of-fact”, without revealing the uncertainties (or possibilities), the writer can lead a person along as if it looks like good research to a final conclusion.
Only big time investigative reporting can drive to final conclusions as their stories research each link along the story path. This takes time, money, investigative journalist expertise of the subject(s) at hand, and sometimes lucky insider source tips.
As to the funding of Sorcha, I do not have any information to answer.