Posted on 07/19/2016 1:07:52 PM PDT by MichCapCon
In a speech before the Ann Arbor Board of Education this May, teacher Dan Ezekiel painted a bleak picture of compensation for teachers.
Ezekiel, a science teacher who also is involved in local politics by serving on various county and city boards and commissions, was concerned about the pay of starting teachers in the district. He said he makes $3,000 less than he did eight years ago.
Michigan Capitol Confidential put in a Freedom of Information Act request for teacher salaries in Ann Arbor for the years 2010-11 to 2014-15. Teacher salaries have become complex in recent years with some districts tying compensation to the health of their general fund and student enrollment. Any analysis of teacher pay needs to be done on a district-by-district basis to be accurate. The review of Ann Arbor’s salaries is part of a series Michigan Capitol Confidential has done this year.
Ezekiel’s salary in 2010-11 was $79,830 and $79,177 in 2014-15, a $653 reduction over a four-year span. And Ezekiel wasn’t alone. Many of the educators in Ann Arbor who had reached the top of the pay scale saw slight reductions, according to a review of teacher salaries.
Michigan Capitol Confidential looked at the salaries of 30 Ann Arbor teachers. Their average salary was $71,960 in 2010-11, which increased to $76,025 in 2014-15.
According to the Michigan Department of Education, the average teacher salary in Ann Arbor was $71,025 in 2010-11 and $72,036 in 2014-15.
The FOIA request for the salary information did not include any additional money teachers could have earned doing extra duties, such as coaching team sports or teaching in summer school. The salaries in the FOIA were in some cases a few thousand dollars less than what the district reported to the state pension office. The state pension office factors in all compensation for pension calculations.
For example, one Ann Arbor teacher saw her salary go from $58,594 in 2010-11 to $63,702 in 2011-12, then $70,352 in 2012-13. That teacher was then paid $72,385 in 2013-14 and 2014-15. However, that teacher's salary that was reported to the state pension office was $75,605 for 2014-15, a $3,220 difference than what was reported in the FOIA.
Ezekiel and other teachers in the district have had concerns about the salaries of younger teachers in the district.
“I eat lunch with all these young moms who are new teachers. Their husbands think they’re crazy. They’re working 60-hour weeks without raises. Can’t they find a job at the same or better pay and with saner working conditions?” Ezekiel told the board.
But his comments don’t hold up when compared to the teacher salaries reported in the FOIA.
For instance, a teacher who started in 2010-11 with a bachelor’s and a salary of $39,276 earned $42,853 in 2011-12. That salary increased to $47,393 in 2012-13 and then to $48,643 in 2013-14. That amount was then frozen in 2014-15. Another teacher who also started in 2010-11 at $39,276 saw the same increases to $42,853 (2011-12) and $47,393 (2012-13). But then she saw her salary increase to $56,450 in 2013-14, where it remained for 2014-15. Although the FOIA gives no details on raises, it’s likely that this second teacher saw an increase to $56,450 due to attaining more education.
Like just about every traditional public school in the state, Ann Arbor pays its teachers based on two criteria – years of experience and the level of education attained.
That first teacher saw a 24 percent increase in salary over four years while the other teacher had a 44 percent increase.
But many veteran teachers saw slight decreases over the same period. Twelve of the 30 teachers reviewed saw their salaries decrease, although the decreases were minimal. For example, two teachers went from $83,572 in 2010-11 to $82,888 in 2014-15, a $684 reduction. Another teacher went from $72,003 in 2010-11 to $71,960 in 2014-15, a $43 reduction. The top-of-scale salary for an Ann Arbor teacher can vary from $65,616 (bachelor’s) to $85,992 (doctorate).
Ann Arbor’s enrollment was steady over the four years. The district had 16,946 students in 2010-11 and 16,901 in 2014-15.
Like just about every other district in the state, Ann Arbor has faced rising pension costs.
According to the district’s audited reports, Ann Arbor Public Schools paid $13.2 million to the state for pension costs in 2010-11. Just four years later, that payment was $31.6 million, an extra $18.4 million.
Christine Stead, the vice president of the district school board, said in an email that increased pension costs have “effectively eroded general funds for schools.”
Stead said the state has to change the way it funds schools if it wants to provide a high quality of education. See Stead’s entire statement here.
Ben DeGrow, the director of education policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, called the statewide school pension system “unsustainable.”
“Trying to cover the state’s retirement promises is taking significant resources away from attracting and rewarding quality teachers to serve students today,” DeGrow said in an email. “Some teachers will eventually reap the rewards after leaving the classroom, but the current system leaves many other teachers with the short end of a stick. The continual need to keep feeding an unsustainable pension system certainly isn’t going to help Michigan improve the weak results we’re currently getting for students.”
The Mackinac Center has proposed closing the school pension system to new employees and giving them a defined contribution 401(k)-type account. The state of Michigan took that path in 1997 when it closed its defined benefit pension system to new employees.
PDRAA=Peoples Democratic Republic of Ann Arbor
My husband worked 8 hours a day and 254 days a year. Not surprising that he made more than a teacher.
I was a teacher and taught from K - community college over four+ decades. My teacher friends NEVER stopped complaining, ever.
Now they complain that their retirement isn't enough.
I went ahead and got my Master's degree and, consequently made MUCH more than they did and have double their retirement.
They COULD have gone the same route as I did, because we ALL had to continue our education over the years. They took "fun" classes and I took the courses for a Master's. It's not rocket science.
Because people pass too many stupid bonds.
So you are suggesting that the 60 hour work-week mentioned might have been an exaggeration. (DUH!!!)
1. MANY BRAND NEW teachers MIGHT work that long, just to get their stuff down.
After teaching the same subject year after year, it OUGHT to be automatic. After five years I could teach my classes in my sleep.
2. If there is a teacher working 60 hours a week, EVERY SINGLE week, then that instructor hasn't a clue as to what his/her subject is. I knew HUNDREDS of teachers over the decades and NOT ONE OF THEM worked 60 hours a week.
Some worked summers but that was USUALLY for the extra cash.
3. The instructor who say that s/he is working 60 hour a week is flat-out lying.
Boo-hoo, wah! THAT was what SOME teachers were good at.
4. I did substitute first grade teaching one year, in a new town. Lol. After a year, EVERY six-year old in town knew me and would say "hello" to me if s/he saw me on the street. Work 60 hours a week? When classes are from 9:00 - 3:00, with lunch, the free prep period and recesses (for the younger grades)?
Please, you are reminding me of the retired teachers I knew who whined CONTINUALLY over the 30+ years of teaching they did. They whined about it all summer, Christmas and Easter vacations, from all over the world.
.
.
Might be?
It is a straight up lie!
Teachers start work around 8 and are out at 2 with a lunch and planning period at the minimum. That is less than five hours in the classroom.
Any business major would make sure they got their work done while lunching and planning period and enjoy life without bitching.
But then again they have actual job.
Teachers cry every day about their pay in the local rag. They ought to be grateful that they have pensions and easy hours. Finally, for the garbage children are indoctrinated with nowadays, i think their pay ought to be cut drastically.
No, I was not serious. I sing the same song you are playing here, about teachers seeming to not work much but always thinking they are the hardest-working and lowest-paid in the entire economy. I probably should have been a teacher, would be earning much more than I do now, if not already retired with a generous pension.
You WORKED for a living, I assume. :o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.