1 posted on
07/14/2016 4:33:33 AM PDT by
NOBO2012
To: NOBO2012
If Supreme Court justices were supposed to be impartial, there wouldn’t be so much drama surrounding their appointments.
2 posted on
07/14/2016 4:35:42 AM PDT by
Wolfie
To: NOBO2012
Why is it that some people think turning over tax returns is a requirement for office.Taxes are private and personal yet many people think they are entitled to see them. They are not a matter of public record.
3 posted on
07/14/2016 4:41:25 AM PDT by
eastforker
(The only time you can be satisfied is when your all Trump.)
To: NOBO2012
“How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns?”
You’d think a SCOTUS judge would know there is no law requiring such an act, and thus nothing to “get away with”.
4 posted on
07/14/2016 4:43:26 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
To: NOBO2012
5 posted on
07/14/2016 4:48:07 AM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
To: NOBO2012
8 posted on
07/14/2016 4:57:19 AM PDT by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: NOBO2012
Is there a requirement for a candidate to provide copies of their tax returns? I think they are only supposed to provide a financial statement. Besides the Wash Post has Trumps tax returns. Didn’t a liberal judge make a sealed document dump containing his tax returns?
9 posted on
07/14/2016 5:02:04 AM PDT by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
To: NOBO2012
Isn’t this the same justice that was performing same sex weddings (illegally)at the same time homosexual marriage was before the court?
14 posted on
07/14/2016 6:59:31 AM PDT by
thirst4truth
(America, What difference does it make?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson