Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comey: Clinton gave non-cleared people access to classified information
The Politico ^ | July 7, 2016 | Nick Gass

Posted on 07/07/2016 9:51:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Hillary Clinton granted non-cleared people access to classified information, FBI Director James Comey testified Thursday.

But he could not definitively confirm that those with access, in this particular instance, her attorneys, had actually read the classified material, and a spokesman for Clinton sharply contested the assertion.

“Did Secretary Clinton's attorneys have the security clearances needed?” Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) asked Comey, who responded, “They did not.”

Asked whether that concerned him, the FBI director said, “Oh yeah, sure.”

But Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon tweeted, “To be clear, the lawyers who sorted through Clinton's emails had Top Secret-level clearance."

Clinton’s personal attorney David Kendall said last August that he received Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information clearance from the Justice Department in November 2013 and a Top Secret clearance from State in the year that followed. In the same letter, Kendall said that his law partner, Katherine Turner, received State clearance in September 2014.

“These State Department security clearances remain active. We obtained them in order to be able to review documents at the Department of State, to assist former Secretary Clinton in preparing to testify before the House Select Committee on Benghazi,” Kendall wrote in the letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who wrote to Secretary of State John Kerry to say that Kendall's clearance was inadequate....

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: comey; crookedhillary; hillary; hillarydrama; ruleofforce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
That’s why it’s called “compartmentalized” information.

Again, you know that, and I know that, but Brian Fallon is, like most of his ilk, absolutely clueless. Clinton's lawyers may well have had a clearance at the level of the data, but they d-d sure did *NOT* have the "need to know", so they were still NOT CLEARED for the specific data involved, and thus should never have seen it.

the infowarrior

21 posted on 07/07/2016 10:25:18 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
United States Oath of Office for Secretary of State



5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office

An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath:

“I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 424.)

22 posted on 07/07/2016 10:25:52 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
well he still runs the F.B.I...the F’in Bergdahl Institution!!
23 posted on 07/07/2016 10:27:33 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

I saw a guy go from Captain to Spec/4 for saying a codeword outside a SCIF.


24 posted on 07/07/2016 10:29:16 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Whatever you think, hoss.


25 posted on 07/07/2016 10:30:45 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Let's Make Our Founding Documents Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: spyone
They subsequently asked for and received top security clearances. The reality is they read each and every email.

I reiterate, if they did exactly that, then they are liable for one count of unauthorized receiving of classified material for each classified *PAGE* (not document), they viewed, because they could not possibly meet the second criteria for laying eyes on it, which is "need to know"...

the infowarrior

26 posted on 07/07/2016 10:35:22 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I saw a guy go from Captain to Spec/4 for saying a codeword outside a SCIF.

He was lucky, that kind of thing *can* get you reduced to Pvt E-1, on your way to an "assignment" at USDP Leavenworth for a while, a long while...

the infowarrior

27 posted on 07/07/2016 10:39:32 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: spyone
They subsequently asked for and received top security clearances. The reality is they read each and every email. It is all lies

Even the Inspector General for the State Department didn't have the required security clearances to read some of the emails that they were investigating and had to bring people in that had the required clearance to read them. Yet, her attorneys supposedly had the clearance. Fallon is spouting a bunch of BS.

28 posted on 07/07/2016 11:53:09 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

google this to read a discussion from a self proclaimed FBI insider:

fbi-insider-leaks-all-clinton-foundation-exposed-involves-entire-us-government

One of his comments:

“All I can tell you about the SAPs is HRC had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors. Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason. “


29 posted on 07/08/2016 12:25:42 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Brian Fallon is a LIAR!!!!! ALL DEMOCRATS ARE LIARS!


30 posted on 07/08/2016 2:10:12 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

The last inner wall of republican free government, equal justice under the law, has been breached. The barbarians are pouring in.

The DOJ somehow can’t even find a misdemeanor violation by someone guilty of treason.

But, 99% of us still think their duty is limited to voting.


31 posted on 07/08/2016 2:32:10 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
But he could not definitively confirm that those with access, in this particular instance, her attorneys, had actually read the classified material, and a spokesman for Clinton sharply contested the assertion.

Funny how, if I were to allow anyone without a clearance to sit in front of a computer that had been connected to a classified network, even if it had not processed any classified data, an investigation would have to be done because I had endangered security....these folks were given full access to computers/devices that had actually processed TS/SCI.....

32 posted on 07/08/2016 4:03:35 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; Hildy
But, 99% of us still think their duty is limited to voting.

And that the votes will be counted properly.

The corrupticrats have gotten so brazen, we may expect a "comey" to announce the election results and defy us to prove otherwise.

33 posted on 07/08/2016 5:20:36 AM PDT by Buttons12 ( It Can't Happen Here -- Sinclair Lewis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

It was all yoga and Chelsea’s wedding planning.


34 posted on 07/08/2016 5:25:22 AM PDT by rhoda_penmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheCipher

They received the clearance AFTER they did the deed.


35 posted on 07/08/2016 7:21:28 AM PDT by spyone (ridiculum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Clinton gave non-cleared people access to classified information.”

Let’s fix that statement: Clinton sold non-cleared people access to classified information.

I think we all know the Clinton m.o.


36 posted on 07/08/2016 10:13:21 AM PDT by DPMD (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hillary Clinton granted non-cleared people access to classified information, FBI Director James Comey testified Thursday.

But he could not definitively confirm that those with access, in this particular instance, her attorneys, had actually read the classified material,.........

So they access but did not read anything?!!
They take people for fools.


37 posted on 07/08/2016 10:39:33 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

“She had a very bad day today”
Can you elaborate on this?


38 posted on 07/08/2016 3:48:53 PM PDT by MS.BEHAVIN (Women who behave rarely make history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MS.BEHAVIN

nope..

did you follow the House of Rep’s yesterday and Comey?

The entire day was spend on Hillary’s Lying. she was the topic..of course she had a bad day...


39 posted on 07/08/2016 5:49:22 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Incorrect. All classified info is handled with the need-to-know approach. Compartmentalization is a when those with a needed to know are placed on a list or added to the compartment for a specific set of info.


40 posted on 07/09/2016 11:13:26 AM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson