Um, I believe his comments are dripping with irony, if not out and out sarcasm.
I’m here screaming BS! You are exactly right!
Comey wanted the job. He knew full well that part of the ‘territory’ was taking responsibility and making hard decisions. But when it came time for him to stand tall he stooped instead and slinked away like a weasel.
Comey is just another self-serving Washington bureaucrat. Nothing more.
The liberal press, knowing she would be exonerated, built up the myth of Comey's integrity in the months preceding his whitewash. He is as corrupt as anyone.
We saw “FBI”. In reality Comey is a lifelong hack lawyer DC and government type. Hadn’t spent one day as a cop.
Not a single arrest in his life.
Hack.
No Comey, a career civil servant is protecting his job by doing what his boss wants done.
Remember that scene in one of the dirty Harry movies? Where he was interviewing the woman who the fix was in for, and he asked her to describe her last arrest....and she had never made one. That’s Comey.
“For example, I think laws regarding abortion are most credible when they are agreeable to the majority of women, no matter what the majority of men think. Imagine an abortion-related law that was acceptable to 90% of men but only 10% of women. It wouldn’t be credible. Nor should it be.”
This isn’t rational thinking.
Freegards
They will care so much that the dead will vote and the illegals will be counted twice!
He undermines his own argument. Like he said, 50% of the people believe this was a travesty of justice and are screaming mad about it - and the other 50% realize this was a travesty of justice but are keeping their heads down because they want the lying criminal to win the election. Everyone knows this was a travesty of justice, as the implication is that the law is not being applied equally to all citizens. She is getting special treatment, and people know this makes the government illegitimate and not credible.
Also, if she were indicted, she would still have the option to drop out of the race and allow an honest candidate to run in her place against Trump. Or she could stay in the race and people could vote for her anyway. Maybe she would win, even if under indictment, and at least people would go tot he polls knowing that the government were not illegitimate by giving her special privileges. Some people would not like that result, but at least they would know it is legitimate and credible. Instead we now all see that the government is not credible and not legitimate.
Not true. It may have, and I stress may have, cost her the nomination, but that is it.
He sacrificed his reputation but not his career. He preserved his career by deliberately and intentionally lying.
It was the wrong decision. He could have told the truth and then been fired by bammy, unable to find a job in any democratically-controlled area. But he didn’t. He caved to the pressure that bammy put on him. Now he is a disgraced failure.
We don’t know what bammy would have had done to him if he had done what is upright and just. I suspect Comey knows what becomes of people who oppose bammy.
And when the FBI comes knocking on Dilbert’s door, will Comey once again take the bullet?
“Comey is a hero.”
Is this a joke?
He’s a coward and a traitor, bought and paid for by the Clinton crime family.
I happen to agree with Scott Adams who I’ve come to realize is one of the more insightful observers of this election process, and maybe of politics in general.
People forget that AG Lynch is perfectly within her rights to reject Comey’s obviously faulty reasoning for not recommending charges be brought, and to proceed with an indictment anyway.
By setting forth the results of his investigation, results which not even the Dems are disputing currently, and which put each of Hillary’s past lies on the matter on full display, Comey has made it clear that Hillary abused her position.
And now, by “convincing” AG Lynch that no indictment is warranted (again, she is free to disagree and take action anyway), Comey has effectively sucked Lynch into Hillary’s circle of corruption, along with all the liberals who are now crowing that Hillary did nothing wrong.
But Comey couldn’t have made it clearer that she did plenty wrong. The House is even now preparing to discuss perjury with Hillary given the clear contrast between her lies and his investigative findings, which is probably why the House wants to see his specific evidence.
So, against all this background, the people get to decide whether they want someone of Hillary’s caliber to be the next President. Adams is right; Comey handled it well given his choices. And his comments on a government retaining credibility are worth considering as well, as they were quite insightful in my opinion.
I also agree with his side point that we should consider sticking with an eight member Supreme Court. People forget that the original court was made up of six members which meant that overturning a Congressional action effectively required a 2/3 majority of the court. Otherwise any law passed would stand. In fact, we should consider returning to six.
There is one angle of Comey’s statement to consider more carefully, the point at which he said, “...our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor, i.e., US Attorney, would bring such a case.” The law in question, Title 18 USC, Section 793, is a federal law and, as such, a US Attorney would have to agree to prosecute the case. ALL US Attorneys are appointed by the president; would any US Attorney appointed by Obama be willing to prosecute Hillary Clinton...?
Wake up you fool. On a globalist run planet, national voting is for losers. If they think Hillary could lose, they won’t hold the election. Globalism must be deleted in its entirety. Just look at Britain, they are already working to undo the Brexit vote. They thought they had that one wrapped up when they killed one of their own and blamed it on the leave crowd.
