Answer: Nothing.
Hillary will ‘get out of’ this situation the same way she always does.
What’s next?
Hillary asks: What the heck am I going to drink now??
<><> (1) the State Department,
<><> (2) the Clinton Foundation,
<><> (3) as a private consultant,
<><> (4) consulted Teneo, a global financial firm w/ Bill Clinton a member of the board.
<><> formed her private company "Zain Endeavors,LLC" 12 days before she exited State.
=========================================
Taxpayers should demand to be informed if Huma, Mills, and other Clinton cronies are STILL listed as State Dept employees---perhaps as contractors---and are still receiving classified mail and govt paychecks.
Evidence indicates Hillary and aides did not sign exit forms. Signing the exit form would have cutoff access to State Dept info......info the Clintons rely on to cash-in.
Note Brian Pagliano---Hillary's personal IT---left her employ then surfaced on the public payroll as a State Dept contractor.
======================================
Taxpayers demand to know who else among the Clinton cronies are cashing US govt paychecks It's an old bureaucratic trick for a politician to hand-pick people and put them on the public payroll long after you think they're gone......perhaps as State Dept "contractors."
<><> Hillary?
<><> Bill Clinton?
<><> Sid Blumenthal?
<><> Huma Abedin,
<><> Huma's husband?
<><> Cheryl Mills?
<><> Cheryl mills' live-in David Domenici?
<><> Chelsea Clinton?
<><> Chelsea's husband?
========================================
CONTACT CONGRESS HERE: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
Demand Congress send you all available information on individuals connected to Hillary still cashing US govt paychecks. In light of the $6 billion missing from the contractor fund when Hillary exited, taxpayers demand to know who is listed as a State Dept contractor.
Sen Grassley wrote in a June 13, 2015 letter:
It appears that one of Abedin's clients, the Clinton-connected Teneo Strategies, may have been compensating Ms. Abedin for gathering information from US government sources for the purpose of informing investment decisions of her consulting clients - or in other words, political intelligence. This raises important questions about whether Abedins dual role was adequately disclosed to government officials who may have provided her information without realizing that she was being paid by private investors to gather information.
Grassley's letter recounted:
<><> Abedin allegedly sent or received more than 7,000 emails on her US government account that involved Teneo's Doug Band, a close confidante and travel companion of the globe-trotting Bill clinton;
<><> one email exchange involved Teneo's Doug Band pressuring Abedin to encourage her State Department boss, Hillary Clinton, to facilitate a White House appointment for one of his clients. Judith Rodin, then-president of the Rockefeller Foundation, "donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation," Mr. Band allegedly noted in his email to Ms. Abedin.
<><> email evidence allegedly suggests that Ms. Abedin and another Hillary aide, Cheryl Mills, colluded to find a way to ensure the US govt paid for Ms. Abedin's travel to and from New York.
<><> multiple allegations received by Sen Grassley's Judiciary Committee indicated Abedin had actually taken leave during her time as a govt employee, casting doubt on whether Abedin should have received $33,000 in taxpayer money.
<><> allegations surfaced that the State Dept personnel rule was quietly bent to permit Abedin to collect her government paycheck while wielding her influence to the benefit of her other employers.
<><> Hillary Clinton jetted to Ireland with Abedin at her side for her last official trip before exiting the State Dept, during which Hillary attended an event hosted by a major Clinton Foundation donor that had been promoted by Teneo (for which Abedin then-served as a "consultant")
<><> Abedin's special employment status gave her heavy influence over Hillary Clinton's State Dept daily schedule and travel plans at the same time Abedin served as a senior adviser at Teneo, and performed other duties at the Clinton Foundation.
<><> Abedin using information about Hillary's travel schedule in discussions w/ her clients, could be a serious breach of US ntl security, since even the calendar and travel plans of the Secy of State is considered classified information.
<><> Abedin was among several key aides to Hillary Clinton that hosted email accounts on a private server in the 2016 presidential candidate's Chappaqua, New York home, in violation of federal records laws.
REFERENCE Abedin worked as a full-time staffer to Hillary Clinton January 2009-June 2012; she was then given a "special government employee" designation and took on roles at the Clinton Foundation and Teneo. That designation is designed to allow individuals who fill "an unmet government need for rare or unique expertise" to retain their private-sector positions while receiving compensation from the government.
Abedin is currently vice-chair of Hillary's presidential campaign committee.
Since this is for the civil trial, I don’t care that much. It’s the upcoming criminal case that matters. I didn’t care when the IT guy took the 5th in this trial earlier, either. As someone else pointed out, it’s actually better that way, because Hillary’s team of lawyers still has no idea what he has divulged to the FBI. By pleading the 5th, he prevents them from having extra time to prepare for the things that will come out in the criminal trial later.
So let them all plead the 5th. Anyone on Hillary’s side who does so merely reinforces the impression that they have something to hide.
MSM: Nothing to see here, move along.
Things seem set to require Hillary to testify; Judge Sullivan seems tired of the stonewalling. But if Hillary is forced into a deposition, she will:
1) Remember nothing;
2) Say that her attorneys advised about everything and handled it all...ask them. Oops, they are all claiming attorney client privilege and will not talk either.
3) Grandstand and posture and dodge for an eternity.
She has walled herself off with legal barriers from day one.
After Hillary defers to the attorneys, JW should ask Hillary to release her attorneys to answer questions about the email setup, criteria for deletion, etc. so all this confusion can be cleared up.
About the same thing that has happened to Brian Magliano - zilch, zero, nada.
Trump will probably go after Hillary directly but he has an additional attack
“While Hillary insists she did nothing wrong, many people under her committed crimes that require them to take the 5th to avoid prosecution. Hillary is unfit for president if she didn’t notice that everyone under her is committing crimes.” More so if she was aware and allowed them to continue.”
Water boarding.
Based on his actions so far, he hasn’t been bought. IT dude had a n excuse which was verified by the judge. It will be interesting if the judge threatens Huma with contempt if she doesn’t testify.
You haven’t paid attention to the Clintonian and Democrat mobs way of handling questions about their criminal acts.
They merely repeat over and over that they “don’t remember” or “have no specific recollection” about anything on which they are questioned.
Cheryl Mills already started the parade in her testimony. It looks better than taking the 5th and you can’t prosecute someone for testimony that says they don’t remember.
Just saw article on Nesmax by Ed Klein. It can be founf at http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/hillary-fbi-interview-stalling/2016/06/28/id/736028/
Hillary has been stalling and continues to stall. I am fairly familiar with investigation and don’t understand why they have to talk to Hillary. If she doesn’t want to talk to the FBI they should proceed without her. She isn’t going to cooperate anyway. Her lawyer has been in daily contact with the FBI/DOJ. Hillary denies she has ever been contacted. This needs to be explored.
Well now that Loretta Lynch has met with Bill Clinton, my question has been answered. Full and total whitewash coming. Lynch has been doing some :strange” things lately but this defies logic. Is she trying to push this into Special Prosecutor Status and thus move it back a few years?